Skip to main content

Security report for pieksajaiset.fi

Other · Finland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.pieksajaiset.fi is a Finnish event site promoting the Pieksäjäiset functional training team competition scheduled for November 1-2, 2024 in Pieksämäki, Finland. The site is built on the Wix platform and uses standard Wix technologies including JavaScript, Webpack, and Sentry for error monitoring. The content is primarily event-focused, targeting local sports enthusiasts and participants. The site has good design quality and mobile optimization but lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, as well as explicit contact information. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing advanced security headers and incident response details. Overall, the domain registration is privacy protected, which is typical for small event sites, and no suspicious patterns were detected. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult or explicit content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pieksajaiset.fi

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pieksajaiset.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pieksajaiset.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind the website appears to be a small-scale event organizer focused on functional training competitions in Finland. The market positioning is local and niche, targeting sports teams and fitness communities. The business model likely revolves around event registration and participation. There is no evidence of broader commercial activities or partnerships. The website content is consistent and professionally presented, but lacks detailed business information, certifications, or trust signals. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the current data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses Sentry for error monitoring, indicating some level of security awareness. However, it lacks key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of contact information further reduces the ability to report security issues. Overall, the security maturity is basic with room for improvement in compliance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Add a cookie policy with a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Include clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  4. Enhance security by adding standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve security transparency and incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Pieksäjäiset - Toiminnallisen harjoittelun joukkuekilpailut; Pieksämäki, Veturitori 1.-2.11.2024
Key services
Toiminnallisen harjoittelun joukkuekilpailut
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, Sentry (error monitoring), Webpack
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Content Security Policy not detected
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Sentry (error monitoring)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data present for SEO and social sharing.
  6. Website is in Finnish language targeting local audience in Pieksämäki, Finland.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No business certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
  9. No incident response or security contact information found.
  10. Website content is event-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Wix and uses Wix's standard JavaScript libraries and Webpack for bundling. Performance is moderate with standard optimizations. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no advanced SEO structured data beyond basic JSON-LD for website identity. No custom backend or advanced frameworks detected. The technical stack is typical for small event websites built on Wix, offering ease of use but limited customization for advanced security or compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pieksajaiset.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pieksajaiset.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.