Skip to main content

Security report for picabo.cz

Picabo.cz, a.s. · Other · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

49/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Picabo.cz, a.s. is a Czech Republic based company established in 2000, providing technical support services as indicated by their 24-hour hotline. The website is minimalistic, focusing on basic company contact and registration information without detailed service descriptions or interactive features. The technical infrastructure is simple, using basic HTML and CSS without advanced frameworks or CMS detected. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, and missing privacy and cookie policies. No analytics or tracking technologies are present, indicating minimal user data collection. Overall, the website is functional but lacks modern security and privacy compliance features, which could impact user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching picabo.cz

This scan found 14 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
0
Average
57
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a service-oriented business model targeting general customers needing technical support. Market positioning is not explicitly stated, but the long domain age and official registration suggest an established presence in the Czech market. The business appears small in size with no subsidiaries or parent company indicated. The lack of detailed service information and digital marketing tools suggests a low digital maturity level. No partnerships or related domains were identified. The company provides clear contact information, which supports credibility but lacks broader trust signals such as certifications or testimonials.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers exposes the website to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency and readiness for security events. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data was found, but the minimal technical implementation suggests limited security controls. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvement to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure data transmission.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response contact channel and vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Enhance website content and technical infrastructure to improve user experience and security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Picabo.cz, a.s.
VAT number
CZ28478649
Registration number
28478649
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Picabo.cz, a.s.
Description
Picabo.cz, a.s. is a company registered in Prague, Czech Republic, providing technical support services with 24-hour hotline availability. The website provides company address, registration details, and contact information but no detailed business description or service portfolio.
Key services
technical support
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is minimalistic with basic company information only.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No forms or interactive elements detected.
  4. No external links or social media profiles present.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data.
  7. Company contact information is clearly presented.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML5 and CSS without detectable modern frameworks or CMS platforms. No JavaScript libraries or analytics tools are present, indicating a simple static site. Performance is likely moderate given minimal content but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags present. The lack of HTTPS and security headers is a technical risk. There is an opportunity to modernize the site with responsive design, enhanced accessibility, and improved security configurations to reduce technical debt and improve operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with picabo.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review picabo.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.