Skip to main content

Security report for pflegevertraege.de

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

pflegevertraege.de is currently a parked domain managed via Bodis, a domain parking service, displaying placeholder content and advertisements primarily from Google Ads. The site lacks any substantive business information, contact details, or services, indicating it is not actively used for commercial or organizational purposes. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no advanced frameworks or CMS detected. Hosting is provided by Bodis, and the site uses HTTPS but lacks additional security headers or privacy mechanisms. Security posture is minimal with no incident response or data protection policies evident. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile but also low trust and credibility due to its parked status and lack of content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pflegevertraege.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain does not represent an active business entity and serves primarily as a placeholder for potential domain sale inquiries. There is no evidence of a business model, revenue streams, or target customer segments. The use of Bodis and Google Ads suggests monetization through advertising and domain resale. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The lack of business information and contact details limits any meaningful business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a positive baseline security measure. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible privacy or cookie consent mechanism, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of forms reduces attack surface but also indicates minimal user interaction. Overall, the security posture is weak and would benefit from standard hardening practices if the site were to become operational.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information and business details to enhance credibility and trust.
  4. Establish an incident response plan and publish relevant contact channels for security issues.
  5. Consider transitioning from domain parking to an active website with meaningful content and services to improve business and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a parked domain with placeholder content and advertisements. It does not provide business-specific information or services.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Ads, Bodis domain parking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bodis
Tracking pixels
Google Ads cookie.js
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Bodis domain parking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain with no active business content.
  2. No contact information or business details provided.
  3. Uses Bodis domain parking service with Google Ads integration.
  4. No security headers detected; only basic HTTPS present.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies exist but are minimal and not comprehensive.
  6. No forms or user input fields present.
  7. No social media or external business-related links found.
  8. No evidence of security or incident response policies.
  9. Content safety rating is safe with no adult or explicit content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript and integrates Google Ads and Bodis domain parking scripts. There is no CMS or advanced framework detected. The site loads moderately fast but lacks mobile optimization beyond basic responsiveness. SEO is minimal with only a basic meta description and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are limited. The hosting provider is Bodis, specializing in domain parking services. Technical debt is low due to the site's simplicity but modernization would be required for active business use.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pflegevertraege.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pflegevertraege.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.