Skip to main content

Security report for pfeifer-langen.de

Pfeifer & Langen GmbH & Co. KG · Manufacturing · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pfeifer & Langen GmbH & Co. KG is a well-established German sugar manufacturing company founded in 1870, specializing in regional and sustainable sugar production. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with a focus on B2B customers across food, chemical, pharmaceutical, and feed industries, as well as agricultural partners. The company emphasizes sustainability and regional sourcing as key differentiators. Technically, the website is built on the Sitefinity CMS platform, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and uses modern UI components like Swiper.js for interactive content. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a professional user experience with clear navigation and rich content. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure; however, the absence of security headers and explicit security policies indicates room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS domain registration data is a notable concern, though the website's branding and external social media presence support its legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and privacy compliance but should address domain registration transparency and enhance security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pfeifer-langen.de

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
90
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pfeifer-langen.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pfeifer-langen.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on sugar and related products, serving multiple industrial sectors including food, chemical, pharma, and feed industries. Their business model centers on sustainable production and regional partnerships, supported by digital tools like a CRM B2B portal and agricultural portals. Market positioning is strong in Germany with a long history and diversified product offerings. The website's external links to partner portals and social media channels indicate an integrated ecosystem. Growth indicators include active sustainability campaigns and a large workforce. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage suggests a controlled communication strategy, likely directing customers to dedicated portals or contact pages. The company maintains a consistent brand image and leverages certifications and sustainability badges to build trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, reducing avenues for responsible vulnerability reporting. The site does not expose sensitive data in HTML and uses external portals for login, which may centralize authentication security. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices in security headers, policy publication, and vulnerability management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness of domain ownership.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations to minimize risks from external dependencies and maintain compliance with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pfeifer & Langen GmbH & Co. KG
Description
Seit 1870 machen wir jeden Tag das Leben ein bisschen süßer. Aber Zucker ist mehr als süß: Unser Rübenzucker ist regional, nachhaltig, fair.
Key services
Sugar production, Products for food industry, Products for chemical and pharma industry, Feed industry products, Agricultural partnerships, CRM B2B portal
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Sitefinity CMS, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in German language
  2. No forms detected on homepage; login links redirect to external portals
  3. Strong focus on sustainability and corporate responsibility
  4. Multiple social media channels linked with consistent branding
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  6. Cookie consent implemented via CookiePro
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts published
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. WHOIS data missing, raising domain registration concerns
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Sitefinity CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for interactive sliders and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with video content and multiple images that may impact load times but are balanced by lazy loading techniques. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but HTTPS is enforced, indicating a secure hosting environment. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and implement more robust privacy and security frameworks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pfeifer-langen.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pfeifer-langen.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.