Skip to main content

Security report for petroviceususice.cz

Obecní úřad Petrovice · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Obecní úřad Petrovice operates as the local municipal government office for Petrovice u Sušice, providing administrative and public services to residents and visitors. The website serves as an information portal offering contact details, official documents, public notices, and community updates. The target audience is primarily local citizens and stakeholders interested in municipal affairs. The business model is that of a government entity focused on local administration and public service delivery. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking alongside a cookie consent management system to comply with privacy regulations. The site demonstrates basic mobile optimization and accessibility features but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS identification. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in responsiveness and SEO. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers such as CSP or HSTS. The contact form includes anti-spam honeypot fields, indicating some attention to security. However, the absence of WHOIS data and security policy pages suggests areas for enhancement in transparency and trust. No critical vulnerabilities or adult content were detected, and privacy compliance appears adequate. Overall, the website is functional and serves its purpose as a municipal information portal but would benefit from improved security practices, enhanced technical modernization, and clearer domain registration transparency to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching petroviceususice.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The municipal office holds a stable position as the local government authority for Petrovice u Sušice, focusing on administrative services and community engagement. Its competitive advantage lies in official status and localized service provision. Revenue streams are typical of government funding rather than commercial sales. The target customer segment is local residents and businesses requiring municipal services. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of digital services like electronic filing and online contact forms suggests digital adoption. Partnerships with regional government bodies and information portals like ŠumavaNet.CZ indicate a collaborative ecosystem. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced digital security and transparency to align with modern governance standards.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic, with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented. However, the lack of security headers and explicit security policies indicates gaps in defense-in-depth strategies. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but the absence of incident response contacts and security frameworks reduces preparedness. Compliance with GDPR is suggested by privacy policy presence and data protection officer information. The security culture appears minimal but present, with room for improvement in formalizing policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and update SSL/TLS configurations to maintain strong encryption standards.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to strengthen trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Petrovice u Sušice
VAT number
CZ00255971
Registration number
00255971
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Obecní úřad Petrovice
Description
Local municipal office providing administrative services for Petrovice u Sušice, including public notices, official documents, contact information, and community updates.
Key services
Administrative services, Public notices and official documents, Community information, Contact and support services
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML, Google Analytics, CookieScript Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by Google Analytics and cookie scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • Honeypot anti-spam fields in contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieScript Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a local municipal government portal for Petrovice u Sušice.
  2. Content is in Czech language and targeted at local residents.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for a government domain.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and accessible.
  5. Contact information is comprehensive and includes phone, email, address, and contact form.
  6. No advanced security headers detected; security posture could be improved.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. Website uses Google Analytics and cookie consent management scripts.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, supplemented by third-party services such as Google Analytics and CookieScript for analytics and consent management. No modern CMS or frameworks were detected, indicating a possibly custom or legacy system. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and security headers, which are technical debts that could impact user trust and search engine ranking. Hosting details are not explicit, suggesting potential for infrastructure modernization and improved hosting transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with petroviceususice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review petroviceususice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.