Skip to main content

Security report for petriksunko.lv

SIA Petriks un Ko · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Petriks un Ko is a small Latvian company specializing in the sale and repair of used agricultural machinery and spare parts. Their website provides basic information about their product offerings, including tractors, combines, presses, and various spare parts, targeting agricultural businesses and machinery users in Latvia. The company is a member of the Latvian Agricultural Machinery Traders Association, which adds a level of trust and industry recognition. The website content is straightforward but lacks advanced features such as privacy policies or user interaction forms. Technically, the website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, including Google Analytics and StatCounter for visitor tracking. There is no evidence of a modern CMS or advanced frameworks. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which weakens its security posture. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers, combined with missing privacy and cookie policies, indicates a low maturity level in security and compliance. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit engagement. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the website content and contact details appear consistent with a legitimate small business. Overall, the site has moderate trustworthiness but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance. Strategically, the company should prioritize implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, and enhancing security headers to protect visitors and comply with regulations. Improving website design, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility would also enhance user experience and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching petriksunko.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention petriksunko.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for petriksunko.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche market focused on used agricultural machinery and spare parts sales and repair services in Latvia. Their business model is primarily B2B and B2C sales combined with repair services. The company leverages partnerships with recognized agricultural brands and is a member of a relevant trade association, which supports credibility. Revenue streams likely come from equipment sales, parts sales, and repair services. The target customer segment includes farmers and agricultural enterprises in the Cēsis region and surrounding areas. The website's basic digital presence suggests a small-scale operation with limited investment in digital marketing or e-commerce capabilities. Growth opportunities could include expanding online sales, improving digital marketing, and enhancing customer engagement through better website features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low to moderate security maturity level. Key vulnerabilities include lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and missing privacy and cookie policies, which expose users to potential data interception and non-compliance risks. The use of third-party analytics without visible privacy disclosures further complicates compliance with GDPR. No forms or user input reduce risk exposure but also limit functionality. Incident response and security policy information are absent, indicating limited formal security governance. Overall, the security posture is insufficient for modern standards and requires urgent improvements to protect user data and comply with regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data collection.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Introduce secure contact forms with input validation and CAPTCHA to enable safe user interaction.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Petriks un Ko
Description
SIA "Petriks un Ko" nodarbojas ar lietotu traktoru, lietotas lauksaimniecības tehnikas tirdzniecību, jaunu un lietotu rezerves daļu tirdzniecību un tehnikas remontu. Piedāvā lietotus traktorus, kombainus, preses, kultivatorus, arkļus, pļaujmašīnas, sējmašīnas, grābekļus, minerālmēslu izkliedētājus un citas lauksaimniecības tehnikas rezerves daļas. Uzņēmums atrodas Priekuļu pagasta Jaunraunā, Latvijā.
Key services
Used tractor sales, Used agricultural machinery sales, New and used spare parts sales, Agricultural machinery repair services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics, StatCounter
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected to collect user input
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, StatCounter
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
StatCounter
Marketing tools
StatCounter
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small business site focused on used agricultural machinery and parts in Latvia.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating low compliance maturity.
  3. No HTTPS enforcement or security headers detected, indicating weak security posture.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with email and phone number.
  5. No forms or user input fields detected, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and StatCounter for visitor tracking without visible privacy disclosures.
  7. No social media links found on the site.
  8. Site design and navigation are basic but functional.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; registrant details unknown.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without a detectable CMS or advanced frameworks. It includes Google Analytics and StatCounter for visitor tracking. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for secure web operations. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization for mobile or accessibility beyond basic levels. The site structure and navigation are simple but functional. There is no evidence of modern technical debt or legacy technology, but the absence of security best practices and privacy compliance indicates technical immaturity. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with petriksunko.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review petriksunko.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.