Skip to main content

Security report for peterandpaul.co.uk

Peter & Paul · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Peter & Paul is a specialized brand agency focused on delivering creative, strategic, and visually compelling brand solutions. With over 20 years of experience, they provide services including brand strategy, design, language, identity, digital branding, motion, and art direction. Their website showcases a portfolio of projects emphasizing their expertise in brand development and campaign execution. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, ensuring good mobile optimization and user experience. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which are important for compliance and trust. The WHOIS data for the domain queried is unavailable due to domain naming rules, indicating the domain queried is likely a subdomain rather than a registered domain, which slightly reduces trust from a domain registration perspective. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching peterandpaul.co.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Peter & Paul operates in the brand agency sector, targeting businesses seeking comprehensive branding and marketing solutions. Their business model revolves around creative services including strategy, design, and digital media production. The company appears to be a small-sized agency with a consistent brand presence and a portfolio that highlights diverse client projects. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies may impact client trust and regulatory compliance. The agency's use of modern web technologies and multimedia content suggests a focus on digital maturity and client engagement.

Security posture

The website currently demonstrates a moderate security posture. HTTPS is presumed but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, and there are no visible privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The absence of contact information and security policies may hinder incident reporting and user trust. There are no indications of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. To improve security maturity, the agency should implement comprehensive security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and provide clear contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify via security headers.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Publish contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and mitigate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Peter & Paul
Description
Peter & Paul is a brand agency. They create unboring, beautiful and strategically sound ideas that invite people to your brand and keep them there. They help define brand identity and prepare clients for their future, with 20 years of experience.
Key services
Brand strategy, Brand design, Brand language, Brand identity, Digital branding, Motion and art direction, Campaign strategy, Environmental design, Signage
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Web Fonts (WOFF2)
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. No social media links detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. Website uses modern frontend technologies (Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS).
  6. Content is rich with multiple projects and case studies presented via images and videos.
  7. No visible security headers or explicit security policies found.
  8. WHOIS data query failed due to domain naming rules; domain queried is likely a subdomain.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, combined with Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a contemporary and maintainable tech stack. The site loads multiple high-resolution images and videos hosted on a CDN, which supports performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility are well addressed. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly identified. Hosting appears to be on Railway.app, a cloud platform. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, which may limit marketing insights but enhance privacy. The site could improve by adding SEO enhancements and security best practices such as security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with peterandpaul.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review peterandpaul.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.