Skip to main content

Is peter-alexander.co.uk a Scam? Security Check Results - Peter Alexander

peter-alexander.co.uk Security Report Summary

peter-alexander.co.uk received a security score of 50 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Elevated Risk". This report covers Peter Alexander's website security posture. Peter Alexander operates in the Other industry in United Kingdom.

Peter Alexander is a small bespoke upholstery business based in the Midlands, UK, specializing in handcrafted upholstered furniture such as sofas, chairs, ottomans, and headboards. The company has a longstanding history dating back to 1983 and serves both individual clients and specialist companies. The website presents a professional image with detailed portfolio content and clear contact information, supporting its market position as a trusted bespoke furniture maker. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Bootstrap and jQuery, with SEO optimization via Yoast. While the site is functional and moderately optimized for mobile, it uses an outdated jQuery version that may expose it to security vulnerabilities. The site lacks visible security headers and privacy/cookie policies, indicating gaps in compliance and security best practices. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no advanced security headers or incident response contacts are present. The WHOIS lookup failed due to an invalid query format, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the site is accessible and content-rich but would benefit from technical and compliance improvements to enhance security and trustworthiness.

The security scan identified 37 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: jQuery 1.8.3, Bootstrap CSS and JS, FontAwesome 5.5.0, Google Fonts (Droid Serif, Raleway), Yoast SEO plugin v3.4.2, WordPress CMS.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and business-context intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

P

Is peter-alexander.co.uk Safe? Security Analysis for Peter Alexander

https://www.peter-alexander.co.uk/

Check if peter-alexander.co.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Kingdomsmall
jQuery 1.8.3Bootstrap CSS and JSFontAwesome 5.5.0Google Fonts (Droid Serif, Raleway)Yoast SEO plugin v3.4.2+1 more
Analyzed Completed
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

GDPR-aligned

Data handling

EU

Hosting region

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional Report

Unlock the full report for peter-alexander.co.uk

Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

AI Summary

Peter Alexander is a small bespoke upholstery business based in the Midlands, UK, specializing in handcrafted upholstered furniture such as sofas, chairs, ottomans, and headboards. The company has a longstanding history dating back to 1983 and serves both individual clients and specialist companies. The website presents a professional image with detailed portfolio content and clear contact information, supporting its market position as a trusted bespoke furniture maker. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Bootstrap and jQuery, with SEO optimization via Yoast. While the site is functional and moderately optimized for mobile, it uses an outdated jQuery version that may expose it to security vulnerabilities. The site lacks visible security headers and privacy/cookie policies, indicating gaps in compliance and security best practices. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no advanced security headers or incident response contacts are present. The WHOIS lookup failed due to an invalid query format, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the site is accessible and content-rich but would benefit from technical and compliance improvements to enhance security and trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.8.3Bootstrap CSS and JSFontAwesome 5.5.0Google Fonts (Droid Serif, Raleway)Yoast SEO plugin v3.4.2WordPress CMS

13 urgent findings need attention

13 high

  • + 5 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep peter-alexander.co.uk under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for peter-alexander.co.uk.

Security Headers

8 findings

15/100

GDPR Compliance

4 findings

35/100

NIS2 Compliance

8 findings

17/100

Email Security

4 findings

70/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Peter Alexander operates in the bespoke furniture manufacturing sector, targeting a niche market of clients seeking high-quality, handcrafted upholstery. The business model focuses on custom orders with a strong emphasis on craftsmanship and client collaboration. The company maintains a loyal client base and leverages its reputation for quality and detail. The website supports marketing efforts with a blog and portfolio showcasing recent work. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. Revenue streams likely derive from bespoke furniture sales and related services. Growth indicators include a maintained online presence and social media engagement via Instagram.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. The use of an outdated jQuery library version introduces potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which may expose the business to GDPR compliance risks. Incident response mechanisms and security contact channels are absent, limiting preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in compliance and technical safeguards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Peter Alexander

Description:

Peter Alexander, makers of quality bespoke upholstered furniture based in the Midlands

Key Services:
Bespoke sofasChairsOttomansHeadboardsCustom upholstered furniture
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.8.3Bootstrap CSS and JSFontAwesome 5.5.0Google Fonts (Droid Serif, Raleway)Yoast SEO plugin v3.4.2WordPress CMS
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based bespoke upholstery business site with good content and portfolio.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the peter-alexander.co.uk security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete peter-alexander.co.uk security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mtasv.net include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

45/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 15 days

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(15 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:35.197.207.4
Name Servers:
ns35.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns36.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025061903, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:35ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mtasv.net include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does peter-alexander.co.uk compare?

See how peter-alexander.co.uk stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and uses FontAwesome for icons and Google Fonts for typography. The technology stack is somewhat dated, notably with jQuery version 1.8.3, which is vulnerable and unsupported. Performance is moderate with no explicit CDN usage detected. SEO is supported by Yoast plugin, and meta tags are well implemented. Accessibility features are basic, and mobile optimization is limited but functional. The site lacks modern security headers and advanced performance optimizations, indicating technical debt and modernization opportunities.
Professional Report

Download the peter-alexander.co.uk report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

Scan your own website

Liked the peter-alexander.co.uk report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about peter-alexander.co.uk

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website