Skip to main content

Security report for pestbaltic.lv

SIA Pest Baltic · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Pest Baltic is a Latvian pest control company with approximately 25-30 years of experience, specializing in insect and rodent extermination services for both businesses and private individuals. The company emphasizes its education from the British Pest Control Association and offers integrated pest management programs tailored to client needs. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and mobile optimization, utilizing modern technologies such as Bootstrap and Google Analytics for tracking. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage implied but no explicit security headers detected. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website reflects a legitimate small business with a solid market position in Latvia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pestbaltic.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pest Baltic operates in the pest control sector targeting both corporate and private clients in Latvia. Their business model includes one-time services and ongoing maintenance contracts, supported by an online program for cooperation and document management. The company leverages its international training as a competitive advantage and maintains partnerships with well-known local companies such as Orkla Latvija and Food Union. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for improvement in regulatory compliance. The company appears to have a stable local presence with a focus on quality service delivery rather than aggressive digital marketing or expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage and no visible forms collecting sensitive data, reducing immediate risk exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates potential vulnerabilities to common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which may hinder effective handling of security incidents. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a dedicated security incident response contact or page to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Review and optimize SSL/TLS configuration to ensure strong encryption and prevent downgrade attacks.
  5. Consider adding social media presence and trust badges to further enhance business credibility and customer engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Pest Baltic
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Pest Baltic
Description
SIA “Pest Baltic” ir uzņēmums, kas nodarbojas ar kaitēkļu kontroli 25-30 gadus. Uzņēmums ir ieguvis izglītību Anglijā British Pest Control Association (BPCA) un piedāvā Integrētu kaitēkļu vadības programmu (IKVP) pielāgotu klientu specifikai.
Key services
Dezinfekcija, Deratizācija, Dezinsekcija, Putnu kontrole, Sezonas kaitēkļi, Online programma, Objektu ekspertīze
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery (implied by bootstrap navbar-toggle), Bootstrap CSS framework
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts loaded over https)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected that collect user data.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No social media links found on the site.
  7. Business appears to be a small, local pest control service with a long history.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. No visible security or incident response policies.
  10. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design and Google Analytics for user tracking. The HTML structure is valid and SEO meta tags are properly set, contributing to good search engine visibility. Mobile optimization is good with a responsive navigation menu and viewport settings. Performance is moderate with multiple images and scripts but no major delays detected. No CMS is explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but provides basic usability. Technical debt appears low, though security best practices need enhancement. Hosting provider details are not disclosed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pestbaltic.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pestbaltic.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.