3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
4of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
This scan found 8 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
70
Not counted
Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
Email security: did not complete in this scan.
DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention pestabetexpert.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for pestabetexpert.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Due to the lack of accessible content and business information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain's suspicious WHOIS data and absence of contact or policy information suggest a low level of transparency and credibility. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or market positioning details are available. The business model and target audience remain unknown.
Security posture
The security posture is difficult to evaluate fully due to the block, but the presence of Cloudflare WAF indicates some level of security protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers, combined with suspicious WHOIS data, reduces confidence. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found. The site is currently inaccessible, which may indicate active security measures or ongoing issues.
Recommendations
Investigate and correct the cause of the Cloudflare WAF block to allow legitimate user access.
Verify and correct WHOIS domain registration data to ensure accuracy and legitimacy.
Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain security.
Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and trust.
Provide transparent contact and business information to enhance credibility and user trust.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Cloudflare detected. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare security service with a block page displayed indicating the user is unable to access pestabetexpert.com due to triggered security rules. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.
Business
Content quality
poor
Technology
Stack
Cloudflare
Analytics and tracking
Site quality
Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare WAF blocking.
No visible business or contact information on the page.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
WHOIS data is suspicious with future creation date and minimal registrant info.
No technical or business metadata available due to block.
No forms, emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected.
Only external links are to Cloudflare and ICANN domains.
No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
Website appears to be either under attack or misconfigured leading to block.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with pestabetexpert.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pestabetexpert.com.