Skip to main content

Security report for perved.org

perved · Other · Bahamas

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Perved.org is an adult content website specializing in free streaming and downloadable pornographic videos, including leaked OnlyFans content. The site operates on a WordPress platform with a focus on advertising revenue, primarily through JuicyAds. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS and WP Rocket for performance optimization. While the site is accessible and moderately optimized for mobile, it lacks critical compliance elements such as privacy and cookie policies, terms of service, and clear contact information. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and DNSSEC. The domain is privacy protected, which is common in the adult industry but reduces transparency. Overall, the site serves a niche adult audience with explicit content but falls short in privacy and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching perved.org

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets adults seeking free access to explicit adult videos, including leaked content from OnlyFans. Its business model relies on advertising revenue, with multiple ad placements from JuicyAds. The site has been operational since 2011, indicating a mature presence in the adult content market. It maintains partnerships or links with various adult and fetish-related sites, enhancing its content offering. However, the lack of formal business contact information and compliance documentation suggests an informal or anonymous operation typical in this sector. The site’s competitive advantage lies in free access to a large volume of adult content, including niche fetish categories.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer is restricted, but DNSSEC is not enabled. The absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS weakens protection against common web attacks. No incident response or abuse contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security incidents. The site uses multiple third-party scripts and advertising networks, which may introduce additional risks if not properly managed. Privacy compliance is poor, with no visible cookie consent or privacy policy, exposing the site to regulatory risks especially under GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC and add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options).
  3. Provide clear contact information including abuse and incident response channels.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising networks for security risks.
  5. Enhance transparency about business ownership and compliance to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
perved
Description
Fresh Porn k2s XXX Rapidgator. The site offers free access to leaked OnlyFans content and various adult videos across multiple categories.
Key services
Free streaming of adult videos, Downloadable adult content, Leaked OnlyFans content, Adult video categorization
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.5, PHP, jQuery, Font Awesome, Cloudflare DNS, WP Rocket, JuicyAds advertising scripts
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (disabled), Yandex Metrika (disabled), Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
JuicyAds
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (commented out), Yandex Metrika (commented out), Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based adult content platform focused on leaked OnlyFans and free porn videos.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating poor compliance.
  3. No company contact emails or phone numbers found; only user registration forms.
  4. Heavy use of JuicyAds advertising network with multiple ad placements.
  5. No visible security headers or incident response information.
  6. Content is explicit adult material with no age verification.
  7. Domain uses privacy protection and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC.
  8. Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika scripts are present but commented out.
  9. Site performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good.
  10. SEO is basic with Yoast SEO plugin detected but minimal meta tags.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on WordPress 6.5.5 with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and WP Rocket for SEO and performance. It uses jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via Cloudflare. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and caching enabled. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is implemented at a basic level with meta tags and structured data. The site relies heavily on JuicyAds for monetization, embedding multiple ad iframes. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. The technical debt appears moderate with room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with perved.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review perved.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.