Skip to main content

Security report for perolike.com

Perolike · Other · N/A

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Perolike.com is a small-scale website currently in a 'Launching Soon' state, built and hosted using GoDaddy's Website Builder platform. The site offers a contact form protected by Google reCAPTCHA and displays a cookie consent banner, indicating basic compliance with privacy norms. The technical infrastructure relies on GoDaddy hosting with a valid SSL certificate, although modern TLS protocols are not enabled, which limits the security posture. No privacy policy, terms of service, or security policy documents are present, which may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. The website's content is minimal, focusing on brand name and launch announcement, with no detailed business or service information provided.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching perolike.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind Perolike.com appears to be in early stages or preparing for launch, with limited public information. The use of GoDaddy's platform suggests a cost-effective and rapid deployment approach. No explicit market sector, business model, or target audience is identified. The lack of social media links, contact emails, or phone numbers limits direct customer engagement channels. The partnership with GoDaddy is critical for hosting and website management. The business intelligence indicates a nascent operation with potential for growth once launched, but currently limited market presence and digital footprint.

Security posture

The security posture of Perolike.com is basic but functional. The site uses a valid SSL certificate issued by GoDaddy, with HSTS enabled including preload, which is a strong security practice. However, the absence of modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) is a significant gap that could expose the site to downgrade attacks or compatibility issues. The Content Security Policy restricts framing to self and GoDaddy domains, reducing clickjacking risks. The contact form is protected by Google reCAPTCHA, mitigating spam and bot abuse. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, indicating limited security governance. DNSSEC and CAA records are not enabled, which could improve domain security. Overall, the site is secure enough for a launch-phase informational site but requires enhancements for production readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols to improve SSL security and compatibility.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to strengthen domain security posture.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Enhance Content Security Policy to cover additional security headers and mitigate XSS risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on GoDaddy's Website Builder platform, leveraging JavaScript and service workers for progressive web app capabilities. External resources include Google Fonts and wsimg.com for media and scripts. The hosting is provided by GoDaddy with a valid SSL certificate but lacks modern TLS protocol support. Performance metrics indicate fast load times, likely due to minimal content and optimized hosting. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and appropriate viewport settings. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and metadata richness. The technical stack is simple and suitable for a launch-phase site but will require scaling and modernization for a full production environment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with perolike.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review perolike.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.