Skip to main content

Security report for performax.cz

Performax · Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

70/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Performax appears to be a business-oriented website with a focus on performance or technology-related services, as indicated by the company name and website title. The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as Nuxt.js and employs analytics tools like Matomo and Google Tag Manager, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of detailed business descriptions, contact information, and compliance policies limits the transparency and trustworthiness of the site. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS likely enabled but lacking visible security headers and policies. Overall, the website is functional and professionally designed but requires improvements in compliance, transparency, and security documentation to enhance trust and credibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of performax.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching performax.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
Average
70

Not counted

  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a professional audience interested in performance or technology services, though explicit business model details are missing. The lack of contact details and corporate information suggests a small-sized entity or a site in early development stages. The use of Matomo indicates a preference for privacy-conscious analytics. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The business could benefit from clearer communication of services, certifications, and compliance to strengthen market positioning and customer confidence.

Security posture

Security measures appear basic; HTTPS is presumably enabled but no security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or incident response contact information, which are critical for GDPR and general data protection compliance. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified, but the site lacks advanced security best practices. Enhancing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents would significantly improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add visible and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  3. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is publicly available or provide justification for privacy protection to improve domain trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize tracking risks and improve user privacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Performax
Description
Performax is a company likely involved in providing services related to performance or technology solutions, based on the website title and domain name. No explicit business description was found in the provided HTML content.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Nuxt.js, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and does not present WAF or security challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies were found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses were found in the content.
  5. Website uses Matomo and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking.
  6. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications are presented.
  7. Website design and navigation are professional and user-friendly.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, indicating a contemporary technical stack. It leverages Matomo and Google Tag Manager for analytics, showing integration of both open-source and commercial tracking solutions. The site appears mobile-optimized with good navigation and design quality. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with some preloading of scripts observed. Accessibility and SEO are basic but could be enhanced with more semantic markup and metadata. Technical debt is not evident but the lack of security headers and compliance documentation suggests areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with performax.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review performax.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.