Skip to main content

Security report for pentester.com

Pentester LLC · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pentester LLC operates a cybersecurity software platform specializing in penetration testing and web vulnerability scanning. The company offers a paid software product priced at $49.99 USD, targeting security professionals and IT teams seeking to secure their digital assets. The website is professionally designed using modern technologies such as Gatsby and React, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. The presence of structured data and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism demonstrates digital maturity and privacy awareness. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and employs security best practices including Google reCAPTCHA v3 and domain registrar locks. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is no publicly visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved. The site integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools, resulting in extensive user tracking but with appropriate cookie consent controls. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image with a solid technical foundation. The domain registration history supports the legitimacy of the business. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing clear security and incident response policies, and adding terms of service to enhance legal clarity and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pentester.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pentester.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
275
Employees
0
Customers
275
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pentester.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pentester LLC is positioned as a niche provider in the cybersecurity software market, focusing on penetration testing tools. The business model centers on software sales with a clear pricing structure. The target audience includes cybersecurity professionals and organizations seeking to improve their security posture. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics providers to optimize outreach and user engagement. Growth indicators include a long-established domain and consistent branding. The lack of explicit contact information on the website suggests a focus on digital sales channels rather than direct customer support. The company operates in the Technology sector with a small organizational size inferred from the website scope. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The website content and metadata reflect a consistent brand identity and professional communication style.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registrar locks preventing unauthorized domain changes. The use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 helps mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, which are important for transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The integration of multiple third-party tracking and advertising services increases the attack surface but is mitigated by consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and contact channels.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify legal terms and user agreements.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Review third-party integrations to minimize tracking footprint and enhance user privacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pentester LLC
Description
Pentester is a powerful software application designed for comprehensive security testing and penetration testing.
Key services
web vulnerability scanning, penetration testing software
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Gatsby 5.12.9, React, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Gatsby, React
Platforms
Windows, Mac, Linux
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Analytics, Taboola, Adroll
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adroll, Taboola, PubMatic, Casale Media, Bidswitch
Tracking pixels
Adroll, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel
Marketing tools
Intercom, Hotjar, Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern static site generation with Gatsby and React
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot
  3. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics integrations present
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  5. No visible terms of service or explicit security policy pages
  6. Domain is well maintained with long expiry and registrar locks
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected, content fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Gatsby, a modern React-based static site generator, ensuring fast load times and good SEO. The use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 and Cookiebot indicates attention to security and privacy compliance. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, contributing to performance and availability. The site includes multiple analytics and marketing scripts, which are well integrated with consent management. Accessibility is basic but present, and mobile optimization is good. The site lacks a traditional CMS, relying on static generation, which reduces attack surface but may limit dynamic content capabilities. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well implemented with opportunities for further security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pentester.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pentester.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.