Skip to main content

Security report for pennynetwork.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.pennynetwork.com currently hosts minimal content, consisting solely of an iframe embedding a third-party service from Oranum.com, which appears to be related to online expert chat or gaming. There is no original content, branding, or business information presented on the site. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating the domain may be unregistered, newly registered, or privacy-protected with no public data. This lack of registration data combined with minimal site content raises concerns about the legitimacy and business authenticity of the website. From a technical perspective, the site lacks any detectable modern web technologies, security headers, or SEO optimizations. There is no evidence of HTTPS usage or SSL configuration, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. The site does not provide any contact information or business credentials, which further diminishes trustworthiness and business credibility. Security posture is very weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and any visible security best practices. The site does not collect user data directly, but the embedded iframe points to an external domain, which may have its own security and privacy considerations. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Given these findings, the website poses a high risk from a trust and security perspective. It is recommended to avoid engaging with this domain until proper registration, content, and security measures are implemented.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pennynetwork.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business intelligence analysis is limited due to the lack of any substantive content or business information on the website. The site appears to act as a simple portal or redirect to Oranum.com, which is a known platform for online expert chat services. There is no indication that www.pennynetwork.com operates independently or offers unique services. The absence of registration data and contact details suggests the domain is not actively used for a legitimate business. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or strategic business relationships are evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is poor. There is no evidence of HTTPS or SSL usage, no security headers detected, and no privacy or cookie policies. The site does not provide any contact information for incident response or data protection officers. The lack of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are present. The embedded iframe could introduce external risks depending on the security of the third-party site. Overall, the site lacks fundamental security and compliance controls.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available or justified if privacy protected.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Provide clear business contact information including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to protect against common web attacks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to embed an iframe linking to Oranum.com, a platform for chat with random experts, likely related to online games or psychic readings.
Key services
online expert chat via iframe
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and consists only of an iframe embedding external site content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, indicating domain is not registered or WHOIS is not publicly available.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Website appears to be a placeholder or redirect to third-party service rather than a standalone business site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is technically minimal, consisting only of a basic HTML page embedding an iframe from an external domain. No CMS, frameworks, or modern JavaScript libraries are detected. There is no metadata beyond a canonical link and a title tag. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. Performance is likely moderate due to the simple structure but could be impacted by the external iframe content. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. Overall, the site appears to be a placeholder or redirect rather than a fully developed web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pennynetwork.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pennynetwork.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.