Skip to main content

Security report for penam.cz

PENAM, a.s. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PENAM, a.s. is a leading bakery and milling manufacturer in Central Europe with a strong market presence since 1992. The company operates under the AGROFERT group and offers a wide range of bakery products, including premium and classic lines, supported by an e-commerce platform. Their website reflects a professional brand image with consistent messaging and clear navigation aimed at general consumers and business clients. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Rank Math SEO, ensuring good performance and SEO optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though the absence of a public security policy and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The missing WHOIS data is a notable gap in transparency but does not significantly detract from the overall legitimacy given the comprehensive business information and certifications presented. Strategic recommendations include publishing formal security and incident response policies and enhancing domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching penam.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong position in the manufacturing sector, specializing in bakery and milling products. Their business model focuses on product quality, innovation, and distribution through retail and online channels. PENAM benefits from its affiliation with AGROFERT, which provides financial and operational backing. The website indicates a mature digital presence with marketing and analytics tools deployed to understand customer behavior and optimize outreach. Partnerships with industry associations and certifications like Superbrands enhance credibility. The target audience spans health-conscious consumers, general bakery product buyers, and wholesale clients. Growth indicators include active product lines, recipe sharing, and a dedicated e-shop. The company maintains a clear and professional communication strategy, supporting sustained market relevance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive cookie consent management, and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot traffic. Security headers are implemented, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness perception. No known vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. The site complies with GDPR through clear privacy and cookie policies. Recommendations include publishing formal security documentation and appointing a data protection officer contact to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Develop and disclose an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure process.
  3. Provide contact information for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS domain registration transparency to improve trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PENAM, a.s.
Registration number
B 4346/KSBR
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PENAM, a.s.
Description
PENAM, a.s. patří k předním pekárenským a mlynárenským výrobcům ve střední Evropě s tradicí již od roku 1992, a to nejen pro svou kvalitu a inovace.
Key services
Bakery products manufacturing, Milling products manufacturing, E-commerce sales via eshop
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Rank Math SEO, Lightbox Photoswipe, Cookie Consent Manager
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Sklik
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, YouTube
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Professional and consistent branding with clear business focus
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent management
  4. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, and physical addresses
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and plugins for SEO (Rank Math), analytics (Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity), and user experience (Lightbox Photoswipe). The site uses Google Tag Manager for tag management and integrates cookie consent management with granular user controls. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and images, though some large images are used. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and device type detection. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and structured JSON-LD data. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with room for performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with penam.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review penam.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.