Skip to main content

Security report for peikko.lv

Peikko Latvija SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Peikko Latvija SIA is a medium-sized manufacturing and distribution company specializing in concrete connections and slim-floor structures for the construction industry. As part of the global Peikko Group, it holds a strong market position as a forerunner in connection technology for precast and cast-in-situ construction. The website targets construction professionals including engineers, architects, and project managers, offering product information, technical documentation, and references to global projects. The business model is B2B focused, leveraging a global network with localized presence in Latvia. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript technologies and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, though some improvements in accessibility and security headers could be made. Performance is moderate with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements. Contact information is comprehensive and professional, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for Peikko Latvija. The main risk is the lack of WHOIS data due to query limits, which limits domain registration verification. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and continuous monitoring of third-party scripts to maintain security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching peikko.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Peikko Latvija operates within the manufacturing and construction sectors, focusing on innovative building solutions such as slim floor structures and concrete connections. Its competitive advantage lies in its global brand affiliation with Peikko Group and a comprehensive product portfolio supported by technical documentation and project references. The business model is B2B, serving construction companies and engineering firms. Revenue streams likely derive from product sales and technical consulting. The company targets professionals in construction and engineering, with growth supported by a broad international presence and multilingual website. Partnerships are evident through related domains and global subsidiaries. The company maintains a professional and consistent brand image, supporting market trust and expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers such as CSP or HSTS suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces a moderate level of user tracking, which is managed with privacy compliance. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly documented, which could be a gap in security culture and transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts such as Google Tag Manager to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Peikko Latvija SIA
VAT number
LV 40103189574
Registration number
40103189574
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Peikko Latvija SIA
Description
Peikko’s concrete connections, slim-floor structures, and other solutions are primed to boost the performance of your construction projects.
Key services
Concrete connections, Slim-floor structures, Technical documentation and support, Product sales and distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at construction industry professionals.
  3. Multiple language versions indicate a global presence.
  4. Contact information is detailed with named personnel and direct emails.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No security policy or incident response information found publicly.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain registration analysis.
  8. Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager scripts for analytics and marketing. The HTML is well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. The site is mobile responsive and includes multiple language versions, indicating a scalable international platform. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional business website with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with peikko.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review peikko.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.