Skip to main content

Security report for peikko.com

Peikko Group · Manufacturing · Finland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Peikko Group operates as a global leader in manufacturing and supplying innovative construction solutions, specializing in slim floor structures and connection technologies for precast and cast-in-situ construction. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence targeting construction professionals, engineers, and designers worldwide. The company emphasizes sustainability and performance enhancement in construction projects through their product offerings and design tools. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, AddSearch, and Google Maps API, ensuring a functional and moderately performant user experience. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, but the absence of WHOIS registration data raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and verifying domain registration details to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching peikko.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention peikko.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
36
Employees
12
Customers
3
Third parties
21
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2026-05-26 · 1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for peikko.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –fs.peikko.com2026-05-26
  • –fs.peikko.com2026-05-15
  • –fs.peikko.com2025-08-28
  • –fs.peikko.com2025-08-18
  • –fs.peikko.com2025-08-11

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Peikko Group holds a strong market position as a global forerunner in construction component manufacturing, focusing on slim floor structures and connection technology. Their business model revolves around supplying high-quality, sustainable construction products and supporting design tools to a global audience. The company targets construction industry professionals and leverages content such as white papers, customer magazines, and technical articles to engage and educate their audience. The website indicates a large enterprise with consistent branding and a broad sector presence including manufacturing, energy, transportation, and real estate. The lack of visible parent or subsidiary company information suggests an independent operation or a holding structure not disclosed on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent compliance aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were detected, indicating good hygiene. The missing WHOIS data introduces a trust gap that should be addressed. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing security policies and enhancing HTTP headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Peikko Group
Description
Peikko’s concrete connections, slim-floor structures, and other solutions are primed to boost the performance of your construction projects.
Key services
Concrete connections, Slim-floor structures, Reinforcement systems, Bolted column connections, Design tools and technical support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, AddSearch, jQuery, Modernizr, Google Maps API, SVG icons
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leadoo Bot
Marketing tools
AddSearch, Leadoo Bot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found
  6. Social media presence includes YouTube channel
  7. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in HTML
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager, AddSearch for site search, and Google Maps API integration. The presence of Modernizr indicates some feature detection for compatibility. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources from both first-party and third-party domains, including taeggie.com for social media widgets. Performance is moderate with some potential for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with peikko.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review peikko.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.