Skip to main content

Security report for pearcefinehomes.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.pearcefinehomes.com appears to be a real estate or home services site built on the Wix platform. However, the domain WHOIS data is unavailable or indicates the domain is unregistered, which raises significant concerns about the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the site. The site uses standard Wix scripts and assets, with no advanced security headers or privacy policies detected. There is no visible business content, contact information, or social media presence found in the HTML content, limiting the ability to assess the business model or market position. Technically, the site benefits from Wix's mobile optimization and basic performance but lacks SEO and accessibility enhancements. Security posture is minimal with no evident best practices implemented. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile and requires significant improvements in transparency, compliance, and security to be considered credible.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pearcefinehomes.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of WHOIS registration data and absence of business-related content or contact information, it is difficult to ascertain the market positioning or competitive advantages of the business behind this website. The site likely targets residential property buyers or sellers but does not provide sufficient information to confirm revenue streams or customer segments. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact channels, suggests a low level of operational maturity and compliance. No partnerships or certifications are evident, indicating a standalone or early-stage online presence.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, and no incident response or security contact information is provided. The site uses HTTPS, but SSL configuration details are unknown. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are found. Overall, the site is at risk of security and compliance issues and should implement standard security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve trust.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information including business emails and phone numbers to enhance credibility and customer trust.
  4. Implement security headers and conduct a security audit to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding an incident response policy and security contact channels to improve security posture and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix, JavaScript, Core-js, Focus-within-polyfill, Intl.Segmenter Polyfill
Platforms
Wix.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets
  2. No WHOIS registration data found for the domain
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links found in the HTML content
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected
  6. Content is minimal and mostly technical scripts and styles, no visible business content extracted
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  8. No advertising or marketing tools detected
  9. Website content is safe and non-adult
  10. Mobile optimization is good due to Wix platform defaults
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Wix and uses Wix's standard JavaScript libraries and polyfills. The site loads multiple scripts from Wix's CDN and uses modern polyfills for browser compatibility. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, but SEO metadata and accessibility features are basic. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal user tracking. The site is mobile optimized by default due to Wix's platform. However, the lack of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. The site would benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pearcefinehomes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pearcefinehomes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.