Skip to main content

Security report for pdiconnections.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at profdata.my.site.com is a Salesforce-hosted login portal primarily designed for authenticated users to access services related to Profdata. The site leverages Salesforce Lightning technology and integrates multiple third-party payment processors such as Stripe, PayPal, and Adyen, as well as analytics tools like Google Analytics and Mixpanel. The platform appears to be targeted at professional users requiring secure access to business services. The absence of public business information and contact details on the login page suggests it is intended for existing customers or employees rather than the general public. Technically, the website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity, utilizing modern frameworks and cloud hosting on Salesforce infrastructure. The Content-Security-Policy header is well-defined, restricting resources to trusted domains, and HTTPS is enforced, indicating a strong security baseline. However, the site lacks additional security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. From a security perspective, the site shows good practices with HTTPS and CSP but could improve by adding more comprehensive security headers and reducing reliance on 'unsafe-inline' scripts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The WHOIS data is unavailable for the subdomain, which is typical for Salesforce-managed domains, and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the site is secure and professionally implemented for its purpose as a login portal but lacks public-facing business and compliance information. Strategic improvements in privacy disclosures and security headers would enhance trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pdiconnections.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Profdata operates within the technology sector, leveraging Salesforce's platform to deliver its services. The business model appears to be B2B or enterprise-focused, providing secure access to proprietary applications or data. The integration with multiple payment gateways suggests some transactional capabilities, possibly for subscription or service fees. The target audience is likely existing clients or partners requiring authenticated access. The company benefits from Salesforce's robust infrastructure and ecosystem, which supports scalability and security. No explicit market position or size information is available, but the use of enterprise-grade tools indicates a medium to large operational scale. The absence of public contact or corporate details limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is solid, with HTTPS enforced and a strict Content-Security-Policy header that limits resource loading to trusted domains. The site integrates with reputable third-party services for payments and authentication, reducing risk exposure. However, the presence of 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' in the CSP reduces its effectiveness and could be exploited if not carefully managed. Additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy are not detected and should be implemented to harden the site further. No signs of malware, phishing, or exposed credentials were found. The lack of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap that should be addressed. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is common for login portals but limits transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Refine the Content-Security-Policy to eliminate 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' directives by using nonces or hashes for scripts.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies on accessible pages to improve compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Provide contact information or a support channel for security incidents and general inquiries to improve trust and incident response readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize security risks and ensure all libraries are up to date.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Salesforce, Stripe, PayPal, Adyen, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Okta, Mixpanel, Coveo, Auth0, Vonage, RingCentral
Frameworks
Lightning Web Components, Salesforce Lightning
Platforms
Salesforce Platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Strict Content-Security-Policy header present
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Mixpanel
Marketing tools
Mixpanel, Coveo, GetConga, CongaMerge
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Salesforce-hosted login portal for profdata.my.site.com
  2. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain, consistent with Salesforce platform usage
  3. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies explicitly found in the HTML content
  5. No contact information or business details explicitly provided on the login page
  6. Strong Content-Security-Policy header present with multiple trusted domains
  7. Multiple third-party integrations for payments and analytics detected
  8. No adult or explicit content detected; site is safe for general audiences
  9. Technical implementation uses Salesforce Lightning and related technologies
  10. Performance and mobile optimization appear moderate to good based on code structure
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Salesforce platform using Lightning Web Components, integrating multiple third-party services for payments (Stripe, PayPal, Adyen), authentication (Okta, Auth0), communications (RingCentral, Vonage), and analytics (Google Analytics, Mixpanel). Hosting is managed by Salesforce, ensuring enterprise-grade infrastructure. The site uses a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to restrict resource loading. Performance is likely moderate given the number of external scripts and integrations, but mobile optimization appears good. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement. SEO optimization is minimal, which is typical for login portals. The technical stack is modern and robust but could benefit from reducing inline scripts and improving security header coverage.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pdiconnections.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pdiconnections.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.