Skip to main content

Security report for pcpresov.sk

Project Consult, spol. s r.o. · Other · Slovakia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Project Consult, spol. s r.o. is a Slovak consulting company specializing in project management and grant consultancy, particularly focused on European and national funding programs. Established in 2004, it serves a diverse clientele including farmers, entrepreneurs, public administration, and NGOs. The company offers comprehensive services from project creation to implementation and monitoring, positioning itself as a reliable partner in the regional market. Technically, the website employs a modern but straightforward technology stack including Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and jQuery. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and professional design, though it lacks advanced CMS or analytics integrations. Hosting is provided by a Slovak hosting provider, aligning with the company's local presence. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. No forms or tracking scripts are present, minimizing data collection risks. The WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the business profile. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening to improve its risk posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pcpresov.sk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Project Consult operates in the consulting sector with a focus on project management and grant applications for European and national funds. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing experience since 2004 and specialized knowledge of multiple funding mechanisms. The business model is service-based, targeting public and private sector clients requiring assistance with investment and non-investment projects. The company maintains partnerships with government bodies and funding agencies, as evidenced by linked external domains. Growth indicators include a stable web presence and detailed service offerings. The absence of social media and advanced marketing tools suggests a traditional business approach focused on direct client relationships.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in case of security issues. The absence of forms reduces attack surface but also indicates limited user interaction. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy publication and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add an incident response contact email such as security@ or abuse@ to improve transparency.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism if cookies are used for tracking or analytics.
  5. Regularly audit SSL/TLS configuration and update libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Project Consult, spol. s r. o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Project Consult, spol. s r.o.
Description
Project Consult, spol. s r. o. is a comprehensive service provider in project management, specializing in the creation and management of projects supported by European structural and investment funds, Norwegian Financial Mechanism, EEA Financial Mechanism, Swiss Financial Mechanism, and national sources. The company serves clients including farmers, food producers, foresters, entrepreneurs, public administration bodies, mayors, NGOs, and other institutions. It offers grant consultancy, project creation (investment and non-investment), project implementation including evaluation, financial management, monitoring, and preparation of strategic and program documents.
Key services
Grant application processing, Feasibility studies, Financial and economic analyses, Strategic document preparation, Project documentation consulting, Public procurement advisory, Project implementation support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, jQuery
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (URL provided is https://)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data
  • No inline scripts with suspicious content

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No forms present that collect user data, reducing privacy risk.
  5. Technical stack is modern but basic, relying on Bootstrap and jQuery.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. No social media links found on the site.
  8. Content is professional, relevant, and consistent with a consulting business.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; potential area for improvement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard HTML5 structure with Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for icons. jQuery is used for interactivity. The site is hosted on WebSupport, a Slovak hosting provider, consistent with the company's location. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or analytics slowing load times. SEO is basic with meta tags present but minimal keyword optimization. Accessibility features are limited but the site is mobile-friendly. No CMS or advanced platforms detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities include adding structured data and improving accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pcpresov.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pcpresov.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.