Skip to main content

Security report for pcporadenstvi.cz

Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.pcporadenstvi.cz is a Czech-language IT advice and news portal offering articles, forums, software downloads, and multimedia galleries. It targets Czech-speaking IT enthusiasts and small business users seeking computer-related guidance. The site operates on Drupal CMS and integrates common advertising and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google Adsense. While the content is regularly updated and relevant, the site lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages, and no official company contact information is provided on the main pages. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Technically, the site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks visible security headers and advanced form protections. Overall, the site appears functional and moderately professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pcporadenstvi.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
78
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche position in the Czech IT advice market, leveraging community forums and content publishing as its primary business model. Revenue is likely generated through advertising networks including Google Adsense and Revive Adserver. The presence of some spam-like forum content suggests potential moderation challenges. The site does not disclose formal business registration or contact details, which may limit trust from business partners or users seeking official support. The technology stack is standard for content sites, with Drupal CMS and common JavaScript libraries. Growth indicators include recent content updates and active user engagement in forums. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries are identified.

Security posture

Security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. The site uses HTTPS, but no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected in the provided data. The login form lacks visible CSRF tokens or CAPTCHA protections, potentially exposing it to automated attacks. No incident response or security policy information is available. Cookie consent is implemented via a third-party GDPR script, indicating some awareness of privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information reduces overall trust and complicates incident response. Recommendations include implementing security headers, enhancing form security, and publishing security and privacy policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add CSRF tokens and CAPTCHA to login and other forms to prevent automated abuse.
  3. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Obtain and publish official business contact information to enhance credibility.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update Drupal and third-party modules to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website providing IT news, PC guides, reviews, and advice primarily in Czech language.
Key services
IT articles and news, PC advice forum, Software downloads, IT image and video gallery
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Adsense, Lightbox2, Revive Adserver, Google Custom Search
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Revive Adserver, Aira OpenAds
Marketing tools
Google Custom Search
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is primarily in Czech language focused on IT advice and news.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is a significant trust and legitimacy concern.
  4. Website uses Drupal CMS with common advertising and analytics tools.
  5. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages detected.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via third-party GDPR script.
  7. No direct company contact information or official business details found on main page.
  8. Some forum posts contain spam-like or unrelated content titles, indicating possible moderation issues.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with jQuery and several modules for star ratings, polls, lightbox galleries, and Google Custom Search. Advertising is managed through Google Adsense and Revive Adserver, with tracking via Google Analytics and Tag Manager. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced accessibility features. The HTML is valid and structured, but no modern frontend frameworks were detected. Hosting provider details are not available. The site could improve SEO by adding structured data and enhancing meta tags. Technical debt appears moderate with opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pcporadenstvi.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pcporadenstvi.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.