Skip to main content

Security report for paybig.com

Other · Netherlands

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Paybig is an adult entertainment affiliate portal that aggregates and links to a wide variety of adult content websites. The site targets an adult audience seeking diverse adult entertainment genres, acting primarily as a referral network rather than a direct content provider. The business model is based on affiliate marketing within the adult industry niche, with a focus on driving traffic to partner sites. The website is hosted in the Netherlands, as indicated by the physical address in the footer, but lacks clear company registration or WHOIS data, which raises questions about ownership transparency. Technically, the website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for client-side scripting, and the Yii PHP framework for backend operations. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a basic but functional design. However, there is no evidence of advanced SEO or accessibility features. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, indicating poor compliance with modern data protection standards such as GDPR. The absence of WHOIS registration data further undermines trust and legitimacy. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a concern for handling potential security issues. Overall, the site presents a moderate risk profile due to its adult content nature, lack of transparency, and weak security posture. Strategic improvements in security practices, compliance documentation, and domain registration transparency are recommended to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching paybig.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Paybig operates in the adult entertainment sector as an affiliate marketing portal linking to numerous niche adult websites. Its competitive advantage lies in the breadth of adult content categories it covers, appealing to diverse adult audiences globally. The business model relies on referral traffic and affiliate commissions rather than direct content creation. The presence of a physical address in the Netherlands suggests some level of operational base, but the lack of company registration details and WHOIS data indicates limited public corporate transparency. The partnership ecosystem is extensive, with many linked domains representing partner sites. Growth indicators are unclear due to limited public business information. The company appears to be small in size with a niche market focus.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of Paybig is low. The website lacks essential security headers and does not provide HTTPS status information, which is critical for secure communications. There are no visible privacy or cookie policies, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The absence of incident response contacts and security policies further weakens the security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the lack of security best practices and transparency poses risks. The site should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and compliance documentation to improve its security maturity and reduce potential business impact from security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Publish clear contact information for security incidents, including abuse and security@ email addresses.
  5. Conduct a full security audit to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Paybig appears to be a portal or gateway site linking to a large network of adult entertainment websites. The site itself does not provide direct services but acts as a directory or landing page for various adult content sites.
Key services
Referral to adult content websites, Affiliate marketing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Yii Framework
Frameworks
Yii
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website acts as a directory for adult content sites
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided
  4. Only physical address found in footer, located in the Netherlands
  5. No security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data
  6. Uses Bootstrap, jQuery, and Yii framework
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  8. Content is adult-oriented and explicit
  9. No WHOIS data available, domain registration status unclear
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Yii PHP framework, Bootstrap CSS framework, and jQuery JavaScript library. This combination provides a responsive and moderately modern front-end experience. The site loads multiple images and external links but lacks advanced SEO meta tags or structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. There is no evidence of a CMS or hosting provider from the provided data. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with paybig.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review paybig.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.