Skip to main content

Security report for patententer.com

PatentEnter s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PatentEnter s.r.o. is a Czech-based intellectual property service provider specializing in patent applications, trademark registrations, design protections, and related consulting services. Established in 2017, the company targets businesses and innovators seeking expert protection of their innovations and brands, positioning itself as a strategic partner in IP protection with a strong regional presence. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive presentation of their services, supported by client references and active social media engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, ensuring good performance and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the domain registration and website content align well, indicating a legitimate and trustworthy business. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing explicit security policies, and maintaining regular security audits.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching patententer.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention patententer.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for patententer.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the intellectual property sector, offering essential services such as patent filings, trademark registrations, and IP strategy consulting. Its business model is service-oriented, catering primarily to innovators, startups, and established companies in the Czech Republic and neighboring countries. The presence of multilingual support and specialized translation services indicates a focus on international clients. The website's client logos and references suggest a solid market position with reputable clients. The firm leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize outreach and client engagement. No direct competitors or partners are explicitly listed, but the company maintains a professional ecosystem with social media and industry presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and implements a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner. Analytics and tracking tools are used responsibly with user consent. However, some recommended security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly present, which could be improved to enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policies are not publicly documented, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is good but can be strengthened with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Maintain up-to-date WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Continue transparent privacy and cookie consent practices to maintain GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PatentEnter s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PatentEnter s.r.o.
Description
Expertní ochrana inovací a značky. Vždy strategicky s orientací na byznys. Patenty, ochranné známky, užitné i průmyslové vzory.
Key services
Patent applications and patent proceedings, Patentability and invalidity searches, Trademark registration and monitoring, Industrial design registration, IP strategy consulting (IP Scan), Specialized translations and patent validations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Smartlook, Fathom Analytics, reCAPTCHA, Slick Carousel, WPML (multilingual plugin), Complianz GDPR plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy plugins (Complianz)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Fathom Analytics, Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Smartlook, Fathom Analytics
Marketing tools
Smartlook, Fathom Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented.
  3. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  4. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools with consent.
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content.
  6. WHOIS data supports business legitimacy and transparency.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. Website content is in Czech with English version available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, WPML for multilingual support, and various analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Fathom, and Smartlook. It uses CDN services for fonts and scripts, and a reputable hosting provider inferred from nameservers. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with caching and minification plugins evident. The technical implementation supports SEO and user engagement effectively, though some improvements in security headers and accessibility could be made to reduce technical debt and enhance robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 52/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with patententer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review patententer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.