Skip to main content

Security report for pastcard.su

Silver4ok "Cheat Engine" Olo4eka · Other · Russia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pastcard.su is a personal blog operated by Silver4ok "Cheat Engine" Olo4eka, focusing on gaming, personal stories, and music content primarily for a Russian-speaking audience. The site is built using the Hugo static site generator and hosted by BEGET-SU, with a domain registered recently in December 2024. The blog features regular posts with a moderate level of content quality and user engagement through social media links. Technically, the site is moderately optimized with basic mobile responsiveness and SEO, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no direct contact information is provided, which limits business credibility and privacy compliance. Security posture is basic, with no detected vulnerabilities but also no advanced protections. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and does not contain adult or explicit content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pastcard.su

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a niche personal blog without commercial business operations or monetization. It targets gamers and tech enthusiasts interested in personal narratives and gaming culture. The business model is content-driven with no evident revenue streams or partnerships. The site maintains a consistent author identity and links to various social media platforms, enhancing community engagement. The hosting and domain registration are transparent and consistent with the site's personal nature. Growth indicators are limited to content updates and social media presence. There are no detected partnerships or subsidiaries.

Security posture

The security maturity of pastcard.su is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from domain and hosting provider but not explicitly confirmed in HTML), but lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are implemented, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. There is no visible incident response or security contact information. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit monitoring capabilities. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities. Recommendations include implementing security headers, privacy policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify via headers.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Provide contact information for security incidents and general inquiries.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to monitor site usage.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Silver4ok "Cheat Engine" Olo4eka
Description
Personal blog by Silver4ok "Cheat Engine" Olo4eka featuring posts about gaming, personal stories, music, and technology interests.
Key services
Blog posts, Music sharing, Links to social media and related content
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Hugo 0.147.9, CSS, JavaScript
Frameworks
Hugo
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal blog with active content and regular posts.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. No security policies or incident response contacts available.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Site uses Hugo static site generator hosted on BEGET-SU.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. External links mostly point to social media and related personal sites.
  10. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Hugo static site generator, indicating a modern and lightweight infrastructure. The site uses CSS and JavaScript for styling and interactivity but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS features. Hosting is provided by BEGET-SU, a known Russian hosting provider. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site does not use analytics or tracking scripts, which limits data-driven improvements. Technical risks are low but the absence of security headers and privacy policies represents technical debt and compliance risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pastcard.su. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pastcard.su.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.