Skip to main content

Security report for passionglide.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PassionGlide.com operates as an adult dating platform offering sensual experiences and adult video content across a wide range of explicit categories. The website targets an adult audience seeking connections and adult entertainment. The business model revolves around providing categorized adult content and facilitating adult dating connections, supported by advertising revenue from adult ad networks. The market position is niche within the adult entertainment industry, with a small-scale operation indicated by limited business information and basic website features. Technically, the site uses legacy technologies such as jQuery 1.11.0 and basic CSS styling, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. The hosting and domain registration are managed via Key-Systems GmbH and Mojohost DNS, but the WHOIS data shows inconsistencies, including a future domain creation date, which raises legitimacy concerns. Security posture is weak, with no visible security headers, no DNSSEC, and outdated libraries. Privacy compliance is poor, lacking privacy and cookie policies or GDPR indicators. Contact information is minimal, limited to a DMCA contact page link without direct emails or phone numbers. Overall, the site presents significant risks related to security, privacy, and legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching passionglide.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a specialized adult entertainment market, focusing on adult dating and video content. Its competitive advantage lies in the breadth of explicit categories and multilingual support. Revenue likely derives from advertising and possibly affiliate marketing through linked adult sites. The target customers are adults seeking discreet and diverse adult content and dating opportunities. The partnership ecosystem includes numerous adult content domains linked as friendly sites, suggesting a networked approach to traffic and monetization. However, the lack of transparent business information, absence of privacy and security policies, and suspicious WHOIS data limit trust and growth potential. The business appears to be a small-scale operator with limited formal corporate structure or compliance measures.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and modern JavaScript libraries exposes the site to potential attacks. The WHOIS data inconsistency and lack of registrant transparency further reduce trust. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The site does not demonstrate GDPR or data protection compliance. Forms are minimal and lack visible security controls. The use of multiple iframes from external adult ad networks may introduce additional security risks. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security architecture, policy transparency, and compliance to reduce operational and reputational risks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration to secure user data and improve trust.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  3. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR and other relevant regulations.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the site against common attacks.
  6. Improve transparency by providing clear business contact information, including verified emails and phone numbers.
  7. Conduct a WHOIS data review and correction to ensure domain registration information is accurate and trustworthy.
  8. Establish an incident response plan and publish security contact channels to enhance security posture and user confidence.
  9. Review and limit third-party iframe usage to trusted sources to reduce security risks from external content.
  10. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Explore your fantasies with a trusted adult dating platform. We connect you with singles and couples who share your interests, ensuring a safe and discreet experience. Join now and start building connections that ignite your passion.
Key services
adult dating connections, adult video content categorized by genre, advertising adult content
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
freexxxbase.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult dating and adult content platform
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact information limited to a DMCA/content removal page link
  4. Uses outdated jQuery version 1.11.0
  5. Multiple external adult content related domains linked
  6. Advertising via freexxxbase.com ad network iframes
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security measures
  8. WHOIS data suspicious due to future creation date
  9. No social media or company contact emails found
  10. No GDPR or privacy compliance indicators present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using legacy jQuery 1.11.0 and basic CSS, with no detected modern frameworks or CMS. The domain is registered via Key-Systems GmbH with Mojohost DNS servers but lacks DNSSEC. The site uses multiple iframe ads from freexxxbase.com, indicating reliance on external adult ad networks. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. SEO is basic with meta description and canonical tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal. The WHOIS data shows a future creation date, which is a critical anomaly. No visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is basic and requires modernization and security enhancements to support business growth and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with passionglide.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review passionglide.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.