Skip to main content

Security report for passcreator.com

Fobi AI Germany GmbH · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Passcreator, operated by Fobi AI Germany GmbH, is a mature SaaS platform specializing in the creation and management of digital Wallet passes compatible with Apple Wallet and Google Wallet. Established since 2012, it serves a broad business audience with solutions including loyalty cards, coupons, event tickets, and membership cards. The platform emphasizes seamless integration, real-time updates, and personalized customer engagement without requiring dedicated apps. Its market position is reinforced by partnerships with notable global brands and certifications such as ISO 27001, underscoring its commitment to security and quality. Technically, the website is built on the Neos CMS and Flow PHP framework, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript and integrations with payment gateways like Stripe and PayPal. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hubspot, and Zapier are employed with privacy considerations like IP anonymization and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, Passcreator shows a strong posture with HTTPS enforcement and ISO 27001 certification. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of explicit security headers or public incident response policies represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, Passcreator presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound digital service platform with minor gaps in transparency around domain registration and incident response. Strategic enhancements in these areas would further strengthen its security and compliance profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching passcreator.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Passcreator operates in the digital wallet and mobile engagement sector, targeting businesses that require dynamic and secure Wallet passes for customer loyalty, ticketing, and membership management. Its SaaS business model generates revenue through subscriptions and transaction fees, supported by integrations with popular payment processors. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and IT service providers and maintains a strong presence in the German and global markets. Growth indicators include a broad client base across insurance, hospitality, retail, and entertainment sectors, with rapid deployment capabilities and a partner program to expand reach. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive feature set, ease of integration, and recognized security certifications.

Security posture

Passcreator demonstrates a mature security posture with ISO 27001 certification and HTTPS enforcement, indicating adherence to recognized information security standards. The website implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements and anonymizes IP addresses in Google Analytics to enhance privacy. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy suggest opportunities to bolster defenses and transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified, and the platform's use of secure payment gateways further mitigates risk. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced security header implementation and formalized incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to reduce attack surface.
  2. Establish and publicly disclose an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Investigate and resolve the absence of WHOIS data to enhance domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  4. Consider adding clear company contact phone numbers and physical address details to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving GDPR and data protection regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fobi AI Germany GmbH
Description
Passcreator helps businesses engage customers with secure, dynamic Wallet passes. Ideal for loyalty cards, coupons, and tickets, it offers seamless integration, real-time updates, and personalized experiences - no app required.
Key services
Wallet pass creation, Loyalty cards, Coupons & vouchers, Event ticketing, Membership cards, Push notifications, API and Zapier integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Stripe, PayPal, Sofort banking
Frameworks
Neos CMS, Flow PHP framework
Platforms
Apple Wallet, Google Wallet
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ISO 27001 certified
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Google Analytics anonymize IP

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hubspot, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hubspot
Marketing tools
Hubspot, Zapier
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on Wallet pass SaaS platform with multiple integrations.
  3. ISO 27001 certification prominently displayed indicating good security posture.
  4. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented with GDPR compliance.
  6. No visible contact phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  7. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information publicly available.
  8. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools with user privacy considerations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring the Neos CMS and Flow PHP framework, supported by JavaScript and jQuery for frontend interactivity. Payment integrations include Stripe, PayPal, and Sofort banking, enabling e-commerce capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy considerations. Technical risks are minimal, though the lack of explicit security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent areas for technical improvement to enhance security and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with passcreator.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review passcreator.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.