Skip to main content

Security report for partywizard.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, DNS health and 3 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website partywizard.co.uk currently serves as a parked domain with minimal content primarily focused on advertising and consent management scripts. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to a registry error indicating the domain name violates naming rules, suggesting the domain is not properly registered or active. There is no visible business information, contact details, or privacy policies on the site. The technical infrastructure includes JavaScript and a Consent Management Platform for GDPR compliance, but lacks visible security headers or SSL configuration details. The site shows signs of low digital maturity and limited user engagement features. Security posture is weak with potential risks from third-party ad iframes and lack of security best practices. Overall, the domain and website present a low legitimacy profile with significant gaps in business credibility and compliance. Strategic recommendations include securing proper domain registration, adding comprehensive privacy and security policies, improving site content and user experience, and implementing robust security headers and SSL configurations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 2 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching partywizard.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of business content, company information, or contact details, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears to be parked or for sale, with no active business operations or market positioning. The presence of advertising and consent management scripts suggests monetization attempts through ads rather than direct business services. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The lack of structured data or metadata further limits insights into business model or target audience.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal and immature. While HTTPS is presumably enabled (based on URL scheme), no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are detected in the provided data. The site uses a Consent Management Platform indicating some GDPR compliance effort, but lacks privacy policies or incident response contacts. The presence of multiple third-party iframes and ad networks introduces potential security risks. No vulnerability disclosure or security certifications are found. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web threats and lacks a mature security framework.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly with valid WHOIS information to establish legitimacy.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service pages.
  3. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the site.
  4. Audit and limit third-party ad and tracking scripts to reduce security risks.
  5. Add clear business contact information and security incident response contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, ConsentManager CMP
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Consent Management Platform for GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Above.com
Tracking pixels
cdn-fileserver.com
Marketing tools
ConsentManager CMP
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Domain WHOIS data unavailable and domain appears invalid per registry
  2. Website content is minimal and primarily advertising/parked domain content
  3. No privacy policy, terms of service, or contact information found
  4. Consent management platform is implemented indicating some GDPR awareness
  5. Multiple external ad and tracking domains present, some suspicious
  6. No visible security headers or SSL configuration details provided
  7. No business or company information present on site
  8. No forms or user input fields detected
  9. No social media or contact emails found
  10. Site may be for sale as indicated by banner at top
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic JavaScript and a third-party Consent Management Platform for GDPR compliance. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The site appears to be hosted on an unknown provider with no clear hosting details. Performance is moderate but limited by the presence of multiple external ad and tracking domains. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with minimal content and poor navigation clarity. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags and structured data. The site is primarily a placeholder with advertising content and no interactive features or forms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with partywizard.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review partywizard.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.