Skip to main content

Security report for parkershots.com

Parkershots · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Parkershots is a small, professional wedding photography business based in Kent, United Kingdom, established in 2008. The website serves as a portfolio and service platform targeting wedding clients locally and nationally. The business offers fine art wedding and portrait photography services, positioning itself as a quality provider in the wedding photography market. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO plugin, hosted with DNS managed by Cloudflare, and uses HTTPS for secure communications. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are employed for analytics and marketing purposes. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Contact information is not explicitly found in the analyzed content, which may impact user trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching parkershots.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the photography services sector, focusing on weddings and fine art portraits. Its market positioning is local to Kent with national and international reach. The business model is service-based, relying on client bookings for weddings and portraits. The website content and social media presence (Facebook) support brand trust and client engagement. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand image and professional content quality. Growth potential may be supported by digital marketing via Google Analytics and Tag Manager. However, the lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies may limit customer confidence and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Domain registration includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses, preventing unauthorized domain changes. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security contact information is published, limiting transparency in case of security issues. The use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics indicates data collection but without visible privacy controls or consent mechanisms, raising compliance concerns. Overall, security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and clear privacy and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  5. Include explicit contact information such as company email and phone number on the website to enhance trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Parkershots
Description
Fine Art Wedding Photographer in Kent. Providing wedding photography in Tunbridge Wells, all of Kent, nationally & internationally. Damn Fine ;)
Key services
Wedding photography, Fine Art Portrait photography
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Cloudflare DNS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional photography portfolio and service site.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin.
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts detected for analytics and marketing.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No incident response or security contact information found.
  8. Domain is secured with HTTPS and has domain status flags preventing unauthorized transfer or deletion.
  9. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized platform. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking and marketing. The HTML content is well-structured with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data for social media sharing. Mobile optimization appears good with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. The site would benefit from implementing these improvements and ensuring privacy compliance to reduce technical and regulatory risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with parkershots.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review parkershots.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.