Skip to main content

Security report for parkctvrtstoleti.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Park čtvrtstoletí' serves as an informational platform for a park competition in the Czech Republic. It provides basic content focused on promoting the competition with minimal additional business information or contact details. The site uses common web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook SDK to enhance user experience and track visitor interactions. A cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of contact or business registration information limit the ability to fully verify the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the site. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected. Overall, the site is functional but basic in design and content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching parkctvrtstoleti.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a general audience interested in parks and related competitions within the Czech Republic. It operates primarily as an informational and promotional platform without evident commercial transactions or extensive business services. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or contact channels suggests a small-scale or event-specific operation. The use of tracking tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK indicates an intent to monitor user engagement and possibly retarget visitors. No partnerships or subsidiary relationships are evident from the data. The business model appears to be event promotion rather than direct service provision or e-commerce.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic. The site uses HTTPS as indicated by the base URL but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No forms or input fields reduce the attack surface, but the absence of explicit security policies and incident response contacts is a gap. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent. The missing WHOIS data and lack of registrant information raise concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a low-risk informational site but could be improved with enhanced headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish clear privacy and security policies beyond cookie consent to improve transparency.
  3. Add verifiable contact information and business registration details to enhance trust.
  4. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and tracking scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider obtaining and publishing domain registration details or using a verified registrar to improve legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Web presence for Park čtvrtstoletí, a competition/exhibition related to parks in Czech Republic.
Key services
Information about park competition, Access to competition details
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, CookieScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by base href
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  4. No contact information or business registration details are present on the site.
  5. Use of common web technologies and tracking tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK.
  6. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond cookie policy found.
  7. Content is minimal and focused on a park competition announcement.
  8. No forms or data collection fields detected on the main page.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  10. No email addresses or phone numbers found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a standard technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK are used for analytics and social integration. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses CookieScript for cookie consent management. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is basic but present. Accessibility features are minimal but some meta tags and viewport settings are configured. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. The site lacks advanced SEO features or structured data markup. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with parkctvrtstoleti.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review parkctvrtstoleti.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.