Skip to main content

Security report for pankas.dk

Pankas A/S · Manufacturing · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pankas A/S is a well-established Danish asphalt company with over 75 years of experience, providing comprehensive asphalt services including production, repair, and paving across Denmark. The company targets both business and private customers, positioning itself as a national leader in the asphalt industry. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its audience. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, CookieYes for consent management, and uses ASP.NET MVC backend as indicated by anti-forgery tokens. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and anti-forgery protections, but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNSSEC implementation. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive cookie policy and GDPR consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, supporting the company's credibility and market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pankas.dk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pankas operates in the manufacturing and transportation sectors, focusing on asphalt products and services. Its business model includes direct sales from factory, B2B contracting, and services for private customers. The company leverages its long history and national presence as competitive advantages. The website indicates active engagement with stakeholders through social media and detailed corporate governance information. No explicit revenue or financial data is present, but the scale and content suggest a large enterprise. The presence of a whistleblower policy and code of conduct indicates mature corporate governance. The company maintains a partner domain (pankas.com) for English-speaking audiences, supporting international or broader market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of anti-forgery tokens to protect forms. Cookie consent is managed via CookieYes and Cookiebot, indicating attention to privacy and compliance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and common security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, representing areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The site uses third-party scripts from trusted sources but should maintain vigilance on their security. Incident response and security policy pages are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pankas A/S
Description
Pankas A/S asfaltfirma udfører alle former for arbejde indenfor asfalt i hele Danmark, heriblandt asfaltreparation og asfaltbelægning. Vi har over 75 års erfaring.
Key services
Asphalt production, Asphalt repair, Asphalt paving, Sales from factory
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, CookieYes Consent Management, Font Awesome, Bootstrap CSS grid, jQuery (implied by Owl Carousel usage), Owl Carousel
Frameworks
ASP.NET MVC (implied by anti-forgery cookie)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-forgery token cookie present
  • Cookie consent management implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
CookieYes, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with CookieYes and Cookiebot.
  3. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  4. WHOIS data is consistent and domain age supports business legitimacy.
  5. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  6. No explicit terms of service page detected.
  7. Website uses modern tracking and analytics tools with GDPR compliance.
  8. Site content is professional, business-oriented, and relevant to the asphalt industry.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including ASP.NET MVC backend, Google Tag Manager, and CookieYes for consent management. It uses responsive design with Bootstrap grid and Font Awesome icons. Performance is moderate with video content and multiple scripts, but overall user experience is good. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph tags, and canonical URLs. The site lacks explicit CMS identification but appears custom-built or enterprise-grade. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and DNSSEC absence are notable risks. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility could be improved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pankas.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pankas.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.