Skip to main content

Security report for pamesa.com

PAMESA CERAMICA COMPACTTO SLU · Manufacturing · Spain

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pamesa Cerámica is a Spanish manufacturing company specializing in the design and production of ceramic flooring and related products. It operates as the parent company within the Pamesa Grupo Empresarial, targeting architects, interior designers, and construction professionals with a broad catalog of ceramic solutions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive product information, architectural solutions, and technical resources such as BIM libraries. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, Google Fonts, and Google Analytics, with a responsive design optimized for mobile devices. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place, though the absence of visible security headers and WHOIS registration data presents areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is well addressed with detailed cookie and privacy policies in Spanish, including user consent options. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, but the missing WHOIS data warrants further investigation to confirm domain legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pamesa.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong position in the ceramic manufacturing sector in Spain, with a large operational scale and a clear focus on architectural and interior design markets. Its business model centers on manufacturing and distributing ceramic tiles and related products, supported by a comprehensive online catalog and technical support tools. The presence of a parent company domain and multiple social media channels indicates a well-established partnership ecosystem. The website content and corporate addresses suggest a stable and credible business operation, though the lack of explicit contact emails and phone numbers on the homepage may limit direct customer engagement. The company appears to leverage digital marketing and analytics effectively to understand user behavior and improve services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder coordinated security incident management. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or registrar issues that affect domain trustworthiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and clarifying domain registration details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trust signals.
  5. Add clearly labeled company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance customer support and credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PAMESA CERAMICA COMPACTTO SLU
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PAMESA CERAMICA COMPACTTO SLU
Description
Compañía matriz del Grupo Pamesa dedicada al diseño y fabricación de pavimentos y productos cerámicos.
Key services
Design and manufacture of ceramic flooring and products, Architectural solutions, Product catalog distribution, Technical support and BIM library, Showroom access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Swiper.js, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Network
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive elements
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy implemented in Spanish
  3. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  4. WHOIS data missing or unavailable, raising domain legitimacy questions
  5. Strong social media presence across multiple platforms
  6. No contact emails explicitly found in HTML source; contact likely via contact page
  7. No phone numbers explicitly labeled in HTML source
  8. Multiple corporate physical addresses with GPS coordinates provided
  9. No forms detected on homepage; contact form likely on separate contact page
  10. Use of Google Analytics and Google advertising cookies evident
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including JavaScript, jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, Bootstrap for UI components, and Google Fonts for typography. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO optimization through meta tags and structured content. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected from the HTML source. The site includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with toggles for different cookie categories, reflecting good privacy compliance practices. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and WHOIS data completeness are areas for improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pamesa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pamesa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.