Skip to main content

Security report for pamats.lv

Pamats un Co, SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pamats un Co, SIA is a Latvian small manufacturing company specializing in concrete products such as concrete steps, restoration of concrete steps and cement tiles, wooden steps, balustrades, railings, and small architectural forms for gardens and parks. The company has been operating since at least 2009 and targets construction professionals, architects, and property owners. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and product offerings. Technically, the website uses a combination of popular JavaScript libraries and CSS frameworks such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome, providing a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts but lacks visible security headers and privacy/cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and contact details support a legitimate business presence. Overall, the site scores moderately on content quality, technical implementation, and business credibility but scores low on privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pamats.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pamats.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pamats.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pamats un Co operates in the manufacturing sector focused on concrete and architectural products. The company appears to have a stable local market position with a clear product portfolio and target audience. The business model is manufacturing and restoration services, with revenue likely generated from product sales and restoration contracts. The website shows no evidence of extensive partnerships or subsidiaries. The company maintains direct contact channels and a professional web presence but lacks advanced digital marketing or privacy compliance features. Growth indicators are not visible from the website alone. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related domains or partner sites are identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. The use of third-party tracking scripts like Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. Overall, the security maturity is basic, with room for significant improvements in headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and visible consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and plugins to their latest secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pamats un Co, SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pamats un Co, SIA
Description
SIA “Pamats un Co” specializes in the production of concrete products including concrete steps, restoration of concrete steps and cement tiles, wooden steps, patterned cement tiles, balustrades, railings, fences, and architectural garden forms.
Key services
Concrete steps production, Concrete step restoration, Cement tile production, Wooden steps, Balustrades and railings, Small architectural forms for gardens and parks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.1, Bootstrap CSS, Font Awesome, Fotorama, Flexslider, Parallax Slider, Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in the footer.
  4. No forms detected on the main page; no data collection fields visible.
  5. Use of multiple JavaScript libraries and plugins for UI and tracking.
  6. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  7. Website uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts.
  8. No security headers visible in the provided HTML content.
  9. Content is relevant and professionally presented for a small manufacturing business.
  10. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and several UI plugins like Fotorama and Fancybox for galleries and modals. The site is mobile optimized and has a clear navigation structure. However, no CMS or backend technology is identified, suggesting a custom or static site. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities include adding modern security headers, improving privacy compliance, and enhancing SEO with structured data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pamats.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pamats.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.