Skip to main content

Security report for pamatniknarodnihopisemnictvi.cz

Muzeum literatury · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.muzeumliteratury.cz represents the Czech Museum of Literature, a government-affiliated cultural institution focused on literature, exhibitions, research, and educational services. The site provides comprehensive information about current and upcoming exhibitions, visitor information, research services, and educational programs, targeting a broad audience including the general public, researchers, and educators. The museum maintains partnerships with ticketing platforms and other cultural portals, enhancing its service offerings and outreach. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript technologies, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and uses New Relic for performance monitoring. The site is served over HTTPS with appropriate security headers, indicating a good security posture. The design is professional, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation, contributing to a positive user experience. Security-wise, the site demonstrates adherence to best practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, reflecting basic GDPR compliance. Overall, the website is a legitimate, well-maintained cultural institution portal with moderate technical sophistication and a solid security foundation. Strategic improvements could include publishing explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and enhancing accessibility features to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pamatniknarodnihopisemnictvi.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Czech Museum of Literature operates as a government/non-profit entity within the cultural and educational sectors. It holds a stable market position as a recognized institution in the Czech Republic, offering museum exhibitions, archival research, educational programs, and event hosting. Revenue streams likely include government funding, ticket sales (via partners like colosseumticket.cz), and educational services. The target customer segments encompass general visitors, researchers, educators, and cultural enthusiasts. The museum maintains partnerships with ticketing services and literary portals, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include active event programming and online virtual exhibitions. The business model focuses on cultural preservation and public education rather than commercial profit.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and multiple security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were found in the analyzed content. The use of reputable analytics and monitoring tools like Google Tag Manager and New Relic is noted, with no evidence of vulnerable libraries. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. The WHOIS data absence reduces domain trust verification, though the website content and external partnerships support legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for inclusivity.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Muzeum literatury
Description
Official website of the Czech Museum of Literature offering information about exhibitions, events, research services, and visitor information.
Key services
Museum exhibitions, Research and archival services, Educational programs, Event hosting, Online catalogs and virtual exhibitions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, New Relic monitoring, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), New Relic Browser
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about museum exhibitions and services.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Uses HTTPS with security headers indicating good security posture.
  4. Includes privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  6. External links mostly to trusted cultural and ticketing partners.
  7. Uses Google Tag Manager and New Relic for analytics and monitoring.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with integration of Google Tag Manager and New Relic for analytics and performance monitoring. The HTML structure is valid with appropriate meta tags supporting SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph, Twitter cards). The site is mobile-optimized and loads CSS and JS assets efficiently. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details were not identified. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with room for modernization and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pamatniknarodnihopisemnictvi.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pamatniknarodnihopisemnictvi.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.