Skip to main content

Security report for palloliitto.fi

Suomen Palloliitto · Other · Finland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Suomen Palloliitto is the official governing body responsible for all football and futsal activities in Finland. The organization manages the development and promotion of these sports nationally, providing news, updates, and comprehensive match result services. The website serves as a central hub for Finnish football enthusiasts, players, and stakeholders, offering relevant content and services tailored to this audience. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, supported by a CMS (DatoCMS) and enhanced with Cookiebot for privacy compliance. The infrastructure appears robust with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the domain registration and website content align well, indicating a trustworthy and legitimate presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing security policies, and providing clearer contact information for security incidents.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching palloliitto.fi

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention palloliitto.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
107
Employees
0
Customers
106
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
21%

6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for palloliitto.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Finnish Football Association holds a strong market position as the national authority for football and futsal. Its business model focuses on governance, sport development, and service provision including news and match results. The organization targets football players, clubs, fans, and related stakeholders within Finland. Revenue streams likely include memberships, sponsorships, event ticketing (via partners like lippu.fi), and merchandising. The partnership ecosystem includes ticketing platforms and tournament management services. The website reflects a mature digital presence with consistent branding and professional content, supporting the organization's strategic goals and community engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, some standard security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly visible and should be verified. The absence of a published security policy or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of public security contact information. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by formalizing policies and enhancing header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly configure security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and vulnerability disclosure program (e.g., security.txt) to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to facilitate incident reporting and response.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.
  5. Enhance user trust by including visible certifications or trust badges related to security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Suomen Palloliitto
Description
Palloliitto vastaa maamme kaikesta jalkapallo- ja futsaltoiminnasta ja sen kehittämisestä. Sivuilla myös jalkapallouutiset ja maan kattavin tulospalvelu.
Key services
Football and futsal governance, Development of football and futsal activities, News and updates on football, Comprehensive match result services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare (likely for CDN and security)
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, TikTok
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Freshchat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-branded for a national sports federation
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in Finnish language
  3. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  4. No visible security or privacy red flags
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page HTML
  6. Multiple external domains related to partners and service providers
  7. Good SEO and social media metadata present
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack centered on Next.js and React, supported by DatoCMS for content management. It uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics integration. Hosting and CDN services appear to be provided by Cloudflare, enhancing performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of script loading and asset delivery. The technical implementation is solid, but continuous monitoring and updates are recommended to maintain security and performance standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with palloliitto.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review palloliitto.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.