Skip to main content

Security report for package.lt

BrandGame · Other · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BrandGame is a Lithuanian-based creative agency specializing in comprehensive branding and packaging design services. Established in 2014, the company targets businesses seeking professional branding solutions to enhance their market presence. Their website reflects a focused business model centered on creative design, with a clear presentation of contact details and social media engagement to support client outreach. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a modern and flexible digital infrastructure. The presence of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts shows an intent to monitor user engagement and optimize marketing efforts. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS encryption and anonymized IP tracking in analytics, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could enhance protection against DNS attacks. There is no visible security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure, which are areas for potential enhancement to build trust and compliance. Overall, BrandGame presents as a credible small business with a professional online presence. To strengthen their security posture and privacy compliance, they should consider implementing comprehensive policies, security headers, and DNS security measures. These steps will improve user trust and align with best practices in digital security and data protection.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching package.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention package.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for package.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BrandGame occupies a niche market segment focused on branding and packaging design, leveraging creative expertise to serve businesses needing visual identity solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in specialized design services and a clear digital presence supported by active social media channels. The business model is service-oriented, with revenue likely generated through client projects and design contracts. The target customer segment includes small to medium enterprises and startups requiring branding support. The company shows growth potential through portfolio sharing and social engagement, though no direct e-commerce or subscription models are evident. Partnerships appear limited to platform providers like Astra and Elementor, with no disclosed strategic alliances. Operationally, the company maintains a lean structure consistent with a small-sized agency.

Security posture

The current security maturity of BrandGame's website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization, reflecting some privacy awareness. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential DNS spoofing and clickjacking risks. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface, but also limiting direct user interaction. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited readiness for security incidents and compliance gaps with GDPR and NIS2 directives. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with room for significant improvement in transparency and technical defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and display an incident response policy with dedicated contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to prevent vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BrandGame
Description
BrandGame is a company specializing in whole branding and packaging services. They offer creative and design solutions focused on branding and packaging, targeting businesses that require professional branding identity and packaging design.
Key services
Branding, Packaging design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Astra WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics anonymize IP enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site using Elementor and Astra theme.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages found.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address in Lithuania.
  4. Social media presence is active on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, and Behance.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage or main content for direct contact or data collection.
  6. HTTPS is enabled with Google Analytics configured with IP anonymization.
  7. No advanced security headers or policies are present.
  8. No security or incident response information is published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  10. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern WordPress CMS with the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, providing a flexible and visually appealing platform. The use of Google Fonts and Google Analytics indicates integration with common web services. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization techniques detected. Mobile responsiveness is good, supported by Elementor's responsive design features. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or advanced semantic markup observed. SEO optimization is minimal, with meta tags present but no structured data such as JSON-LD for enhanced search engine understanding. The technical stack is standard for small creative agencies, offering ease of maintenance but requiring enhancements for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with package.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review package.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.