Skip to main content

Security report for p3pm.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.p3pm.co.uk presents itself as a provider of HR consultancy and business HR services, targeting businesses likely in the Altrincham and Manchester areas. The site uses modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, and integrates third-party services like Google Tag Manager and Trustpilot for analytics and reviews. However, the domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to an error indicating the domain name is invalid under Nominet UK naming rules, which raises concerns about the legitimacy or registration status of the domain. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, and no explicit contact information is provided on the site, limiting transparency and trust. The content is professional and safe, with no adult or questionable material detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching p3pm.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to operate as a small HR consultancy service provider, focusing on delivering HR services to businesses in specific UK regions. The business model is service-oriented, with key offerings in HR consultancy. The lack of detailed business information, such as company registration or VAT numbers, and absence of contact details limits the ability to fully assess market positioning or growth indicators. The integration of Trustpilot suggests an attempt to build trust through customer reviews. The website's technical infrastructure is modern but lacks comprehensive compliance and security disclosures.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but incomplete. HTTPS is presumably enabled (not explicitly confirmed), but no security headers were detected in the provided data. The site uses third-party scripts which may introduce risk if not properly managed. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, nor incident response or security contact information, which are important for compliance with GDPR and other regulations. The domain registration status is suspicious, which could pose risks related to domain hijacking or trustworthiness. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Verify domain registration status and resolve any issues with Nominet UK to ensure domain legitimacy.
  3. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  4. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) and disclose it on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
HR consultancy services for businesses, likely focused on HR support and consultancy in the Altrincham and Manchester areas.
Key services
HR consultancy, HR services for business
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Nuxt.js, Google Tag Manager, Trustpilot Widget, CookieYes
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes, Trustpilot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no WAF blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable and domain appears invalid per registry error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found in the content.
  5. Uses modern frontend technologies (Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS).
  6. Includes third-party scripts for analytics and reviews (Google Tag Manager, Trustpilot).
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected in provided data.
  8. Content is professional and related to HR consultancy services.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. Limited business information and trust indicators present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js framework and styled with Tailwind CSS, indicating a modern frontend architecture. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Trustpilot for customer reviews. The site appears to be mobile optimized with good navigation clarity. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate based on the technology stack and script usage. There is room for improvement in SEO optimization and accessibility features. The absence of security headers and privacy disclosures indicates technical debt in compliance and security domains.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with p3pm.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review p3pm.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.