Skip to main content

Security report for p-pink.cz

Pardubický podnikatelský inkubátor · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

P-PINK is a local business incubator based in Pardubice, Czech Republic, dedicated to supporting aspiring entrepreneurs by providing coworking spaces, project consultations, and startup support services. The website reflects a small-sized organization with a clear focus on fostering business growth in its regional market. The business model centers around incubation and coworking, targeting early-stage entrepreneurs and startups. The site is built on the Bitrix24 platform, integrating CRM and form functionalities to facilitate user engagement and lead capture. The technical infrastructure includes reputable third-party services such as Cookiebot for GDPR compliance, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of p-pink.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching p-pink.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a key local player in the entrepreneurial ecosystem of Pardubice, offering essential services like coworking and business incubation. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized support for startups and leveraging Bitrix24's CRM capabilities for efficient client management. Revenue streams likely include coworking fees and consulting services. The target customer segment is early-stage entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic. The partnership ecosystem includes technology providers like Bitrix24 and analytics services. Strategic observations suggest a focus on regional market penetration and community building rather than large-scale expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the business scale but with room for enhancement to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with best practices and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pardubický podnikatelský inkubátor
Description
Jsme Pardubický podnikatelský inkubátor. Naším cílem je pomáhat začínajícím podnikatelům stát se úspěšnými. Přijďte s námi váš nápad zkonzultovat, těšíme se na vás!
Key services
inkubátor, coworking, konzultace projektů
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bitrix24, Cloudflare DNS, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Frameworks
Bitrix Framework
Platforms
Bitrix24 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • Use of reputable third-party analytics and tracking with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Marketing tools
Leady, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a local business incubator focused on supporting entrepreneurs in Pardubice, Czech Republic.
  2. Uses Bitrix24 CMS platform with integrated CRM and forms.
  3. Implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent via Cookiebot.
  4. Includes multiple tracking and analytics tools with consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and domain age supports legitimacy.
  8. No signs of WAF blocking or content restrictions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Bitrix24 CMS platform, leveraging its CRM and form capabilities for business operations. The use of Cloudflare DNS and WEDOS as registrar indicates a standard hosting and domain management setup. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of modern web fonts. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt appears low, but the site could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements. The integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools shows a mature approach to user engagement and data-driven decision making.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with p-pink.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review p-pink.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.