Skip to main content

Security report for oxiform.lt

UAB “Oxiform” · Other · Lithuania

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB “Oxiform” operates as a Lithuanian applied and graphic design studio, providing a range of services including graphic design, printing, sticker production, and advertising materials. Established since 2009, the company targets businesses and individuals seeking professional design and printing solutions. The website reflects a small-sized business with a consistent brand presence and a focus on local market needs. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Complianz GDPR consent management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The presence of Google Analytics and Facebook SDK shows active marketing and user tracking practices. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though additional security headers and policies could enhance protection. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain trust verification, but the website content and business information appear professional and consistent. Overall, the site scores well in content quality, technical implementation, and security, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and business credibility disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oxiform.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
90
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention oxiform.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for oxiform.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized design studio with a focus on applied and graphic design services, serving a niche market in Lithuania. Its business model revolves around service provision in design and printing, supported by an online presence that includes a blog and product store link. The partnership with a related sticker production domain suggests a complementary business ecosystem. The website content and social media presence indicate an established local reputation. Revenue streams likely include design services, printing jobs, and product sales via the linked store. Growth indicators include regular blog updates and multi-language adaptation services. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing online trust signals and expanding digital marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting GDPR awareness. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information published. The use of common WordPress plugins requires regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security collaboration.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize risk from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures, including detailed data retention policies and user rights information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB “Oxiform”
Description
Taikomojo ir grafinio dizaino studija
Key services
Applied design, Graphic design, Printing services, Sticker production, Advertising materials, Layout and sketch preparation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, Slick Slider, Masonry layout, Facebook SDK
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Lithuanian applied and graphic design studio
  2. Content is in Lithuanian language
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented
  4. Contact information includes phone and email with clear business context
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics
  8. No signs of blocking or WAF challenge
  9. Social media presence on Facebook
  10. No terms of service page found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a child theme and uses popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and Complianz for GDPR cookie consent management. The front-end employs jQuery, Slick Slider, Masonry layout, and Facebook SDK for social integration. Google Analytics is integrated via gtag.js for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible. No hosting provider information was detected. The technical stack is modern and standard for small business websites, but security enhancements and performance tuning could improve overall robustness and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oxiform.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oxiform.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.