Skip to main content

Security report for oxfam.org.br

Oxfam Brasil · Other · Brazil

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oxfam Brasil is a medium-sized non-profit organization affiliated with Oxfam International, focused on combating poverty, inequality, and injustice in Brazil through campaigns, development programs, and humanitarian actions. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and targets Brazilian audiences interested in social justice. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates multiple modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and RD Station Forms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and security plugins in use, though some improvements are recommended such as adding security headers and fixing broken lazy-load images. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional image consistent with its mission and organizational claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oxfam.org.br

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
75
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Oxfam Brasil holds a strong market position as a recognized non-profit in Brazil, leveraging its international affiliation for credibility. Its business model relies on donations, advocacy, and partnerships. The organization actively engages with its audience via social media, newsletters, and campaigns. The website supports donation processing through related domains and provides transparency and governance information. Growth indicators include active campaigns and recent news updates. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains for donations and materials. Strategic observations highlight the organization's focus on social justice and community engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of security-related WordPress plugins. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers and presence of broken lazy-load images represent minor vulnerabilities that could affect user trust and security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be improved. Data collection via forms is accompanied by privacy notices, indicating awareness of data protection requirements. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced headers and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Fix broken lazy-load images to improve user experience and reduce potential phishing risks.
  3. Publish explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oxfam Brasil
Description
A Oxfam International é uma confederação de 19 organizações e mais de 3000 parceiros, que atua em mais de 90 países na busca de soluções para o problema da pobreza, desigualdade e da injustiça, por meio de campanhas, programas de desenvolvimento e ações emergenciais.
Key services
Campaigns, Development programs, Humanitarian actions, Research and reports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Mouseflow, RD Station Forms, Select2, Slick Carousel, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
AWS (DNS via AWS Route 53)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security plugins (honeypot, WP Armour Extended)
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Mouseflow, RD Station Forms
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Mouseflow
Marketing tools
RD Station Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Portuguese.
  2. Strong presence of social media and external integrations.
  3. Multiple donation and newsletter forms collecting personal data with privacy notice.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Some broken lazy-load images detected which may affect user experience.
  6. No explicit security headers found in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
  7. No visible terms of service page found.
  8. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  9. WHOIS data consistent with website claims and hosting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with a variety of JavaScript libraries and plugins including jQuery, Select2, Slick Carousel, and analytics/tracking tools like Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Mouseflow. Hosting is via AWS, indicated by DNS nameservers. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO. Performance is moderate with some lazy-load image errors that should be addressed. The technical stack is robust but requires ongoing maintenance to ensure security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oxfam.org.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oxfam.org.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.