Skip to main content

Security report for oviedoemyo.com

Other · Japan

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website oviedoemyo.com is a Japanese language skincare content site focused on providing advice and product recommendations for cheek pore care. It targets Japanese-speaking women interested in beauty and skincare, offering curated rankings and information on cosmetic products. The business model appears to be content-driven with affiliate marketing links to various cosmetic product sites. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without a detected CMS, hosted under a Japanese registrar and DNS provider. Performance and mobile optimization are basic but functional. Security posture is weak due to lack of security headers, no DNSSEC, and absence of privacy or cookie policies, which also impacts compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Contact information is limited to a contact form with no direct emails or phone numbers, reducing business credibility slightly. Overall, the site is accessible with no WAF or blocking mechanisms detected, but improvements in security and privacy compliance are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oviedoemyo.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention oviedoemyo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for oviedoemyo.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site occupies a niche in the Japanese skincare market, focusing on pore care for cheeks, a common cosmetic concern. Its competitive advantage lies in curated product rankings and topical advice. The business likely generates revenue through affiliate marketing given the numerous external cosmetic-related links. The target audience is primarily Japanese women concerned with skincare. The site is small in scale, founded in 2019, with no visible parent company or subsidiaries. The content quality is good but lacks comprehensive trust signals such as certifications or testimonials. The partnership ecosystem is unclear but includes many external cosmetic domains, possibly affiliate partners.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from canonical URL), but no security headers are implemented, and DNSSEC is not enabled. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are absent. No vulnerabilities such as exposed credentials or malicious scripts were detected in the provided content. The site uses a third-party analytics service (Research Artisan Pro) without visible consent mechanisms, which may pose privacy risks. Overall, the security posture requires enhancements in headers, DNS security, and privacy compliance to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide direct company contact information including verified emails and phone numbers to improve trust.
  5. Review and ensure all third-party tracking complies with privacy regulations and implement consent mechanisms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides information and recommendations on skincare products specifically targeting cheek pores, including makeup bases, foundations, serums, lotions, and cleansing products. It aims to help users improve skin appearance by addressing pore issues.
Key services
Skincare product reviews, Skincare advice, Affiliate links to cosmetic products
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and in Japanese language.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact available only via a contact form, no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. No social media links or company contact emails detected.
  5. Website uses a basic tech stack with no CMS detected.
  6. No security headers or DNSSEC enabled; domain status clientTransferProhibited is set.
  7. Multiple external links to various skincare and cosmetic related domains, likely affiliate or related content.
  8. Tracking via Research Artisan Pro analytics is present without visible cookie consent.
  9. No visible security or compliance certifications.
  10. Website design and navigation are basic but functional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without a detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Hosting is via a Japanese registrar and DNS provider with multiple nameservers on xserver.jp. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. SEO is basic with meta viewport and canonical tags present. Accessibility features are minimal. The site includes a JSON-LD breadcrumb structured data snippet, which aids SEO. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms. The site uses a third-party analytics script loaded asynchronously. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oviedoemyo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oviedoemyo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.