Skip to main content

Security report for overons.kpn

KPN · Telecommunications · Netherlands

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KPN is a leading telecommunications company in the Netherlands, providing comprehensive fixed and mobile network services. The company is recognized for its reliable infrastructure, innovation, sustainability efforts, and security focus. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as SvelteKit and integrates key marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and incident response contacts could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, supporting user trust. Overall, KPN's website demonstrates a professional, secure, and user-friendly platform aligned with its enterprise market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching overons.kpn

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
90
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KPN holds a dominant market position in the Dutch telecommunications sector, targeting both consumer and business segments. Its business model revolves around network services, innovation, and sustainability, supported by strong investor relations and transparent reporting. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a robust digital ecosystem including dedicated investor and recruitment portals. Growth is driven by network expansion, technological innovation, and sustainability leadership. The website content and linked domains reinforce KPN's credibility and market leadership.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and integrates security-related informational pages. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a public vulnerability disclosure policy limits the security maturity level. Incident response contact details are not explicitly provided, which could hinder rapid communication during security events. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Add comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information on the website to improve communication channels.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and continue optimizing mobile experience to maintain high user satisfaction.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KPN
Description
KPN is a leading Dutch telecommunications company providing reliable fixed and mobile networks connecting people and businesses across the Netherlands.
Key services
Fixed network services, Mobile network services, Innovation in technology, Sustainability initiatives, Security services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
SvelteKit, JavaScript, CSS, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
SvelteKit
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related pages linked

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to telecommunications and corporate information.
  3. Strong presence of corporate trust signals including investor relations and annual reports.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools is evident.
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and accessible.
  7. No explicit security incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including SvelteKit, providing fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. It uses CSS and JavaScript effectively with module preloading for performance. Analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are integrated for user tracking and marketing insights. The site structure is clear with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is modern, performant, and well-structured.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with overons.kpn. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review overons.kpn.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.