Skip to main content

Security report for ovc.gov

Office for Victims of Crime · Government · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) is a U.S. government entity under the Department of Justice dedicated to supporting victims of crime through programs, grants, and resources. The website serves as an official portal providing access to victim assistance information, funding opportunities, training, and multimedia resources. It targets victims, service providers, and allied professionals nationwide. The site maintains a consistent government branding and offers multiple official social media channels for outreach. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 and leverages modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Verint Unified Web SDK for analytics and user engagement. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and follows good SEO practices. Embedded YouTube videos and a custom search engine enhance user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses secure external scripts. While explicit security headers are not fully confirmed, the site shows no signs of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy and legal policies are present, though cookie consent mechanisms could be improved for compliance. WHOIS data is incomplete but consistent with government domain policies, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and a good security posture. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing incident response policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ovc.gov

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

OVC holds a strong market position as a federal government agency focused on victim services and justice programs. Its business model revolves around grant administration, resource provision, and capacity building for victim service providers. The agency benefits from a broad partnership ecosystem within the Department of Justice and related bureaus. The website reflects a stable, enterprise-level operation with a clear mission and target audience. Growth indicators include active funding announcements and resource updates. The partnership network includes multiple specialized DOJ offices, enhancing program reach and impact.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks. The use of reputable analytics and tracking services is balanced with privacy considerations, though cookie consent mechanisms are minimal. The absence of a published incident response policy or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. WHOIS data limitations are mitigated by the .gov domain status. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by formalizing incident response and disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly document security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and provide clear contact channels for security incidents.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to enhance privacy compliance and user transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Office for Victims of Crime
Description
OVC, a part of the U.S. Department of Justice, oversees programs and grants for service providers and other professionals who assist victims of crime.
Key services
Victim assistance programs, Grant management, Training and technical assistance, Resources for victims and providers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, YouTube embeds, Verint Unified Web SDK, Google Custom Search Engine, US Web Design System (USWDS), AnchorJS, Clipboard.js, DataTables
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure external scripts
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, DAP DigitalGov Analytics, Verint Unified Web SDK
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Verint Unified Web SDK
Marketing tools
GovDelivery subscription overlay
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official U.S. government website with .gov TLD
  2. Content focused on victim assistance and related programs
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and accessibility standards
  5. Presence of multiple social media official channels
  6. No WAF or blocking detected
  7. WHOIS data incomplete but consistent with government domain policies
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and secure CMS platform, and integrates multiple third-party services including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Verint SDK for analytics and user engagement. The site uses US Web Design System standards for accessibility and responsive design, ensuring good mobile optimization and user experience. Performance is moderate with some reliance on external scripts and embedded content. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to optimize script loading and enhance security header implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the agency's mission effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ovc.gov. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ovc.gov.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.