Skip to main content

Security report for outroll.com

Outroll · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Outroll is a software holding company, venture builder, and managed services provider that manages, builds, and acquires software companies. The company positions itself as a permanent home for software, targeting software businesses and investors. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with a focus on technology and software industry services. The domain is mature, created in 2009, supporting the company's established presence. Technically, the website uses modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, hosted via Cloudflare, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO and accessibility basics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, but lacks published security policies and incident response information. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Contact information is limited to a contact form with no direct emails or phone numbers. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching outroll.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention outroll.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for outroll.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Outroll operates in the technology sector as a software holding company and venture builder. Its business model revolves around acquiring and managing software companies, providing managed services, and building ventures. The company targets software companies and investors seeking a stable operational home. The website highlights partnerships and case studies, indicating active client engagement and a growing ecosystem. The lack of direct contact details and limited public business registration information suggests a lean organizational structure or a focus on digital-first engagement. The company leverages modern web technologies and cloud hosting to maintain a scalable and performant online presence. Strategic partnerships with educational and technology institutions are implied by displayed logos. The business appears to be small to medium in size with a focus on quality and professionalism.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare as a hosting and CDN provider, which enhances security and performance. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds protection against unauthorized domain transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC is a missed opportunity to strengthen DNS security. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, which requires careful configuration to avoid privacy issues. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Security headers are likely present but not explicitly confirmed. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing security and privacy policies and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add explicit security and incident response policies, including contact channels for security issues.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Provide direct contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Outroll
Description
We manage, build, and acquire software companies. We are a software holding company, venture builder, and managed services provider.
Key services
software company management, software company building, software company acquisition, venture building, managed services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Toastify
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and navigation
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Contact information is only via contact form, no direct emails or phone numbers found
  4. No security or incident response policies published
  5. Technologies used are modern and appropriate for a software holding company
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  8. Domain WHOIS data supports legitimacy and maturity
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, combined with Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a contemporary and maintainable tech stack. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is hosted on Cloudflare, providing CDN, DDoS protection, and SSL termination. Performance is moderate with preloading of key assets and responsive images for mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. The technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and privacy-focused configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with outroll.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review outroll.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.