Skip to main content

Security report for outdooractive.sk

Outdooractive · Other · Slovakia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Outdooractive is a well-established online platform catering to outdoor sports enthusiasts, offering comprehensive services such as interactive maps, route planning, travel guides, and community engagement. The website targets hikers, cyclists, skiers, and adventure travelers primarily in Slovakia but with a broad international presence supported by multi-language versions. The platform demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with modern technologies like Leaflet.js and Mapbox GL for mapping, and a custom framework for content delivery. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and appropriate security headers, though there is room for improvement in privacy compliance and incident response transparency. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and provides valuable content for its audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching outdooractive.sk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Outdooractive occupies a significant niche in the outdoor activity and travel market, leveraging a freemium business model with premium content offerings. Its competitive advantage lies in detailed, professionally curated routes and maps, supported by local experts and a vibrant community. The platform's multi-language support and extensive content coverage position it well for growth in European and global markets. Revenue streams likely include premium subscriptions, advertising, and partnerships with tourism organizations. The absence of explicit contact information and security policies suggests potential areas for operational enhancement. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand and content strategy aligned with outdoor recreation and travel.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS, modern security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and trust. The absence of a cookie consent banner may pose compliance risks under GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious scripts were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be elevated by formalizing policies and improving user privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a clear and user-friendly cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information for general and security-related inquiries.
  5. Enhance transparency around data collection, retention, and user privacy to build greater trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Outdooractive
Description
Portál pre outdoorových športovcov: turistika, cyklistika, horská cyklistika a lyžovanie. S bezplatným online plánovačom výletov a GPS chodníkmi a trasovaním pre tvoj smartfón.
Key services
Interactive maps, Route planner, Travel guides, Community features, Outdoor activity search
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Leaflet.js, Mapbox GL, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
alp (custom framework)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper labels

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. Strong focus on outdoor activities with multi-language support
  3. Good use of structured data and SEO best practices
  4. Lacks visible cookie consent mechanism
  5. No explicit security or incident response contact information found
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt present
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Leaflet.js for interactive maps and a custom JavaScript framework (alp). It employs responsive design and accessibility best practices, ensuring good user experience across devices. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search visibility. Performance is moderate, with some opportunities for optimization in image loading and script management. Hosting details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary content management solution.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with outdooractive.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review outdooractive.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.