Skip to main content

Security report for ourcentre.com.au

Little Athletics Victoria · Government · Australia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Little Athletics Victoria operates the ourCentre website as a comprehensive online resource platform to support its community of athletics centres, volunteers, and stakeholders. The site offers a variety of tools including resource guides, webinars, conference archives, and podcasts to facilitate successful centre management and athlete development. The platform positions itself as an official and trusted resource hub within the Australian athletics community. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress infrastructure with common plugins and frameworks, delivering a professional and responsive user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and no visible critical vulnerabilities, though it lacks explicit security policies and headers. Privacy compliance is a notable gap due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is credible and well-maintained but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ourcentre.com.au

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ourcentre.com.au, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ourcentre.com.au right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a niche non-profit sector focused on athletics community support in Victoria, Australia. It leverages partnerships with the parent organization Little Athletics Victoria and integrates official branding and social media presence to reinforce trust. The business model centers on providing free educational and operational resources to volunteers and committees, enhancing community engagement and organizational effectiveness. The presence of webinars and conferences indicates ongoing community development efforts. The site’s market position is strong within its domain, supported by official endorsements and consistent branding. Growth potential lies in expanding digital resources and improving compliance to meet evolving regulatory standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file reduces the opportunity for responsible vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is weak, with no cookie consent mechanism or privacy policy, potentially exposing the organization to regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a user consent mechanism to ensure GDPR and local compliance.
  2. Implement and publicly link a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Add explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  5. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Little Athletics Victoria
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Little Athletics Victoria
Description
ourCentre is an online resource platform designed to assist Little Athletics Victoria Centres with tools, guides, webinars, and conference materials to help operate successful athletics centres.
Key services
Centre Resource Guide, Online Webinars, Conference Archives, Video Resources, Podcasts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, Bootstrap, jQuery, Revolution Slider, Ajax Search Pro, Google Fonts, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in AJAX calls (implied by WordPress admin-ajax.php usage)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a resource hub for Little Athletics Victoria community.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation menus and resource categories.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Uses multiple third-party scripts for analytics and advertising.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with official email and phone.
  6. No visible security or incident response policies.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  10. Good branding consistency and professional design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a combination of popular plugins such as Revolution Slider and Ajax Search Pro, and uses Bootstrap and jQuery for frontend responsiveness and interactivity. Hosting is provided by Synergy Wholesale Accreditations Pty Ltd, a reputable Australian registrar and hosting provider. The site loads with moderate performance, leveraging Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though opportunities exist to optimize performance and enhance security headers. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were detected in the visible source.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ourcentre.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ourcentre.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.