Security report for oupetrovice.cz
Obecní úřad Petrovice · Government · Czech Republic
The website www.oupetrovice.cz serves as the official online presence for the municipal government of Petrovice, a small community in the Czech Republic. It provides residents and visitors with access to local government services, news, event calendars, and community engagement tools such as participatory budgeting. The site is well-structured, multilingual, and offers various online forms and resources to facilitate communication and service delivery. The business model is focused on public service and information dissemination, targeting local citizens and stakeholders. Technically, the website employs a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various UI enhancement libraries. It uses a custom CMS platform named Progres, which supports modular content management. The site is mobile-optimized and features interactive elements such as calendars and virtual tours. However, performance is moderate and accessibility features are basic, indicating room for technical improvement. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible HTTP security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance and overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust slightly, but the presence of official contact details and consistent branding supports legitimacy. Overall, the website is a functional and trustworthy municipal portal with good content quality and user experience. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and WHOIS transparency would enhance its security posture and trustworthiness.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- NIS2 outside view
- Not assessed
- GDPR outside view
- Not assessed
Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Network security
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
- Critical
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN
- NIS2 21(2)(e)
- IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
- NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
- NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
- High
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
- NIS2 21(2)(e)
- IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
- NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
- NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
- Critical
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching oupetrovice.cz
This scan found 15 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 85
- Email security
- 55
- DNS health
- 80
- Network security
- 0
- Average
- 55
- After the cap
- 49
Not counted
- Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
- GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against web attacks.
- Introduce a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure full GDPR compliance and user transparency.
- Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency and readiness.
- Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
- Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and reach.
Contact details published on the site
- Addresses
- Legal name
- Obecní úřad Petrovice
- Registration number
- 00636771
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Obecní úřad Petrovice
- Description
- Official website of the municipality Petrovice in Moravský kras, providing local government information, news, events, and public services.
- Key services
- Municipal news and updates, Online office services, Event calendar, Public forms and documents, Community engagement (participatory budgeting), Local cultural and social information
- Content quality
- good
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- jQuery 3.6.4, Bootstrap 4.1.3, Bootstrap Datepicker, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, Moment.js, CLNDR.js, Leaflet.js, Add-to-Calendar Button
- Frameworks
- Bootstrap
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- basic
- SEO
- basic
Security
- Observed score
- 60/100
- Good practices seen
- Use of HTTPS (implied by https URLs)
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
- Tracking level
- minimal
- Privacy practices
- basic
Advertising
- Transparency
- poor
Site quality
- Design
- good
- User experience
- good
- Content relevance
- good
- Navigation
- good
- Professionalism
- good
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is a municipal government portal for Petrovice in the Czech Republic.
- Content is in Czech with multilingual options available.
- No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or registry issues.
- No explicit privacy or cookie banners detected, but privacy policy page exists.
- No visible security headers or incident response info.
- Uses modern frontend libraries and frameworks.
- No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
- Contact info is clearly presented with official emails and phone numbers.
- No adult or questionable content detected.
- Good navigation and content structure.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 42/100High36 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with oupetrovice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oupetrovice.cz.