Skip to main content

Security report for otustanausta.com

Other · Bulgaria

Partial score · DNS & email only

69/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.otustanausta.com is a Bulgarian language forum platform focused on user-generated recommendations for various services, specialists, and businesses across different regions in Bulgaria. It serves as a community-driven resource for sharing trusted local information, with monetization primarily through Google Adsense advertising. The site uses the phpBB forum software and integrates common web technologies such as Google Fonts and Font Awesome. While the site is accessible over HTTPS and includes basic security headers, it lacks advanced security measures such as Content Security Policy and X-Frame-Options headers. The presence of session IDs in URLs poses a potential security risk. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are explicitly found, indicating limited privacy compliance. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site provides useful community content but requires improvements in security and compliance to enhance trust and protect users.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching otustanausta.com

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
69

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets Bulgarian users seeking recommendations for local services, specialists, and businesses, positioning itself as a niche community forum. Its business model relies on user-generated content and advertising revenue. The site is small in scale with a moderate content quality and basic technical infrastructure. Lack of visible company information, contact details, and privacy policies limits its business credibility. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable risk factor. The site could benefit from establishing clearer business identity and compliance documentation to improve user trust and market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and some security headers like Referrer-Policy. However, it lacks critical headers such as Content Security Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The use of session IDs in URLs is a security concern that could lead to session fixation or hijacking. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies is found. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to protect user data and improve resilience against attacks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) header to reduce risk of cross-site scripting and data injection attacks.
  2. Add X-Frame-Options header to prevent clickjacking attacks.
  3. Eliminate session IDs in URLs and use secure, HttpOnly cookies for session management.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  5. Establish a security.txt file and incident response contact to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Форум за препоръки на добри услуги, майстори, заведения и специалисти в България. Потребителите споделят мнения и препоръки за различни бизнеси и услуги, организирани по географски области.
Key services
Платформа за препоръки на майстори, специалисти, заведения и други услуги, Форумна дискусия, Рекламно пространство
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
phpBB, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Adsense, JavaScript
Frameworks
phpBB
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (implied by session id in URL)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
whos.amung.us, t.dtscout.com
Marketing tools
Google Funding Choices
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Bulgarian language forum for user recommendations on services and businesses.
  2. Content is user-generated and organized by geographic regions within Bulgaria.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies explicitly found on the homepage.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and includes Google Adsense ads.
  5. Session IDs are passed in URLs, which is a security concern.
  6. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered according to raw WHOIS output.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the phpBB forum platform, utilizing standard web technologies including Font Awesome and Google Fonts. It integrates Google Adsense for advertising and uses JavaScript tracking pixels for visitor metrics. The site is served over HTTPS with a moderate performance profile and basic mobile optimization. Accessibility and SEO features are present but minimal. The site structure is clear with organized forum categories by geographic regions. Technical debt includes session management via URL parameters and lack of advanced security headers. Hosting provider and domain registration details are not disclosed, limiting full infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with otustanausta.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review otustanausta.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.