Skip to main content

Security report for otomir23.me

Other · Russia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website otomir23.me is a personal portfolio site for an individual named Damir, featuring links to various social media and gaming profiles. The site is currently under development and contains minimal content, primarily serving as a placeholder and personal branding platform. The domain is registered through Cloudflare with a creation date in early 2022, consistent with the site's developmental status. Technically, the site uses modern technologies such as Astro and JavaScript, hosted and protected by Cloudflare with HTTPS enabled, ensuring a secure connection. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates room for improvement in security hardening. From a security perspective, the site shows basic good practices like HTTPS and domain transfer protection but lacks formal privacy, cookie, or security policies, and no contact or incident response information is provided. Analytics are limited to Cloudflare Insights with minimal tracking, and no advertising or affiliate marketing is present. Overall, the site is safe, with no adult or explicit content, targeting a general audience. The risk level is low but could be improved by adding compliance documentation and enhancing security headers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching otomir23.me

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

This personal website targets a niche audience interested in the individual's online presence across social and gaming platforms. The business model is personal branding without commercial services or products. The site is small in scale, with no evident revenue streams or partnerships beyond linked partner sites. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal content and lack of business information. The partnership ecosystem includes a couple of related domains linked from the site, suggesting some collaborative or community ties. The site’s market position is that of a personal portfolio rather than a commercial entity, with limited competitive advantage beyond personal reputation.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate, with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing attack surface. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness is not evident, with no security contact information provided. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Add contact information and incident response details to enhance transparency and security posture.
  5. Regularly review and update analytics and tracking practices to ensure privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website or portfolio page for an individual named Damir, featuring links to social media and gaming profiles. The site is under development and contains minimal content.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare, Astro, JavaScript
Frameworks
Astro
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio under development with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. Social media links are present and valid.
  5. Uses Cloudflare for DNS and hosting with HTTPS enabled.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. No forms or data collection fields present.
  8. No business certifications or security policies disclosed.
  9. Analytics via Cloudflare Insights is present with minimal tracking.
  10. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Astro framework and JavaScript, hosted on Cloudflare infrastructure providing reliable performance and HTTPS encryption. The site is mobile optimized with basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal but present through meta tags and structured HTML. No CMS detected, indicating a static or custom-built site. Performance is moderate, with deferred scripts and minimal content aiding load times. Technical debt is low given the site's simplicity, but opportunities exist to improve security configurations and add compliance features. No technical risks such as outdated libraries or exposed credentials were found.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with otomir23.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review otomir23.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.