Skip to main content

Security report for osukalns.lv

SIA "Ošukalns" · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "Ošukalns" is a Latvian multi-branch industrial company founded in 1993, with diversified operations including wood processing, construction, quarry mining, asphalt production, forestry, spare part trade, repair services, real estate, and energetics. The company has a solid regional presence and a history of over 20 years, serving business clients primarily in Latvia. The website reflects a professional business with multilingual support and clear contact information, indicating a mature digital presence. Technically, the website uses a variety of established JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, and FancyBox, built on the K-Panelis CMS platform. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in security headers and modern best practices. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Facebook Pixel is used for tracking, indicating moderate user tracking levels. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the website is professionally designed and functional with moderate security posture and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security policies, incident response readiness, and technical modernization would enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching osukalns.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in multiple sectors including manufacturing, energy, transportation, and real estate, leveraging a diversified business model. Its long-standing presence since 1993 suggests stable market positioning in Latvia. The website highlights key services and branches, supporting a B2B target audience. Partnerships with related domain entities indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The business model appears to generate revenue through industrial services, construction, and energy production. Growth indicators include multi-language support and diversified service offerings. The company maintains a moderate digital footprint with professional branding and partner endorsements.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The presence of HTTPS and cookie consent aligns with basic compliance requirements. However, the absence of security headers, published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security governance. The use of third-party tracking (Facebook Pixel) raises privacy considerations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but improvements in security best practices and transparency are recommended to reduce risk and enhance compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Ošukalns"
VAT number
LV45403003353
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Ošukalns"
Description
OSUKALNS Ltd was founded on 15 July, 1993. Initially a small forest exploitation company, it has grown into a multi-branch business involved in wood processing, road building, mineral resource mining, real estate, thermal energy and electricity production, trucks’ spare part trade, and reconstruction of truck trailers.
Key services
Wood processing, Construction, Quarry mining, Asphalt production, Forestry, Spare part trade, Repair services, Real estate, Energetics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, Flexslider, FancyBox, Isotope
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. Multi-language support for Latvian, Russian, German, English.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  6. Use of multiple JavaScript libraries and frameworks for UI.
  7. Facebook Pixel used for tracking.
  8. Contact information clearly displayed with physical address and phone.
  9. No terms of service page detected.
  10. No security headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the K-Panelis CMS platform with a tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Flexslider, FancyBox, and Isotope. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with SEO-friendly meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. The absence of advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries suggests some technical debt. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with osukalns.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review osukalns.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.